Personal experience with AI-generated peer reviews: a case study

Journals need to promptly adopt transparent policies on LLM use in peer review, in particular requiring disclosure. Open peer review where identities of all stakeholders are declared might safeguard against LLM misuse, but accountability in the AI era is needed from all parties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Integrity and Peer Review
Published
2025-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-025-00161-3
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Personal experience with AI-generated peer reviews: a case study

Nicholas Lo Vecchio
7 citations
Research Integrity and Peer Review
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
4.58
article

Personal experience with AI-generated peer reviews: a case study

Nicholas Lo Vecchio
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Journals need to promptly adopt transparent policies on LLM use in peer review, in particular requiring disclosure. Open peer review where identities of all stakeholders are declared might safeguard against LLM misuse, but accountability in the AI era is needed from all parties.

Research Integrity and Peer ReviewVol. 10(1)
Délégation Provence et Corse (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
4.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.