Assessing particle count in electron microscopy measurements of nanomaterials to support regulatory guidance

In the European Union, nanomaterials are regulated through different pieces of sectoral legislation. This legislation often requires risk assessments and thus reliable characterization data, for which regulatory guidance generally recommend electron microscopy. The guidance provides best practices for measurements but lacks requirements on how many particles to measure. Using transmission electron microscopy data of nanomaterials, a strategy based on repeated subsampling is proposed to establish, for different particle size and shape measurands, mathematical relationships between particle count and precision, and subsequently to determine the minimum particle count. Our results confirm that the minimum particle count generally depends on the width of the size and shape distributions and that the median of the distribution can be determined with the highest precision compared to other percentiles. Upon combining the precision uncertainty related to particle number with uncertainties from other sources, such as sample preparation, calibration and trueness, we reach an optimal particle count above which additional particle measurements only yield negligible improvements to the combined measurement uncertainty. Our findings offer an experimental approach for determining the minimum particle count to measure particle size and shape by electron microscopy. It enables efficient analyses and facilitates compliance with legislation addressing nanomaterials across various application domains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92266-4
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing particle count in electron microscopy measurements of nanomaterials to support regulatory guidance

Charlotte Wouters, Eveline Verleysen, Jan Mast, Vikram Kestens
8 citations
Scientific Reports
Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
5.29
article

Assessing particle count in electron microscopy measurements of nanomaterials to support regulatory guidance

Charlotte Wouters, Eveline Verleysen, Jan Mast, Vikram Kestens
article en
8 citations

Abstract

In the European Union, nanomaterials are regulated through different pieces of sectoral legislation. This legislation often requires risk assessments and thus reliable characterization data, for which regulatory guidance generally recommend electron microscopy. The guidance provides best practices for measurements but lacks requirements on how many particles to measure. Using transmission electron microscopy data of nanomaterials, a strategy based on repeated subsampling is proposed to establish, for different particle size and shape measurands, mathematical relationships between particle count and precision, and subsequently to determine the minimum particle count. Our results confirm that the minimum particle count generally depends on the width of the size and shape distributions and that the median of the distribution can be determined with the highest precision compared to other percentiles. Upon combining the precision uncertainty related to particle number with uncertainties from other sources, such as sample preparation, calibration and trueness, we reach an optimal particle count above which additional particle measurements only yield negligible improvements to the combined measurement uncertainty. Our findings offer an experimental approach for determining the minimum particle count to measure particle size and shape by electron microscopy. It enables efficient analyses and facilitates compliance with legislation addressing nanomaterials across various application domains.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
European Commission (BE), Nanomaterials Research (United States) (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
5.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing particle count in electron microscopy measurements of nanomaterials to support regulatory guidance — Charlotte Wouters, Eveline Verleysen, et al. · Scientific Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS