Physics-integrated neural networks for improved mineral volumes and porosity estimation from geophysical well logs

Accurate estimation of mineralogy from geophysical well logs is crucial for characterizing geological formations, particularly in hydrocarbon exploration, CO 2 sequestration, and geothermal energy development. Current techniques, such as multimineral petrophysical analysis, offer details into mineralogical distribution. However, it is inherently time-intensive and demands substantial geological expertise for accurate model evaluation. Furthermore, traditional machine learning techniques often struggle to predict mineralogy accurately and sometimes produce estimations that violate fundamental physical principles. To address this, we present a new approach using Physics-Integrated Neural Networks (PINNs), that combines data-driven learning with domain-specific physical constraints, embedding petrophysical relationships directly into the neural network architecture. This approach enforces that predictions adhere to physical laws. The methodology is applied to the Broom Creek Deep Saline aquifer, a CO 2 sequestration site in the Williston Basin, to predict the volumes of key mineral constituents—quartz, dolomite, feldspar, anhydrite, illite—along with porosity. Compared to traditional artificial neural networks (ANN), the PINN approach demonstrates higher accuracy and better generalizability, significantly enhancing predictive performance on unseen well datasets. The average mean error across the three blind wells is 0.123 for ANN and 0.042 for PINN, highlighting the superior accuracy of the PINN approach. This method reduces uncertainties in reservoir characterization by improving the reliability of mineralogy and porosity predictions, providing a more robust tool for decision-making in various subsurface geoscience applications. • Petrophysical equations and theoretical bounds are effectively integrated into artificial neural networks (ANN). • Physics-Integrated Neural Networks (PINN) evaluate the Broom Creek Deep Saline Aquifer for CO 2 sequestration. • PINN outperforms traditional ANN in predicting mineralogy and porosity, improving generalization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Geoscience
Published
2025-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engeos.2025.100410
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physics-integrated neural networks for improved mineral volumes and porosity estimation from geophysical well logs

Kegang Ling, Prasad Pothana
7 citations
Energy Geoscience
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
13.06
article

Physics-integrated neural networks for improved mineral volumes and porosity estimation from geophysical well logs

Kegang Ling, Prasad Pothana
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Accurate estimation of mineralogy from geophysical well logs is crucial for characterizing geological formations, particularly in hydrocarbon exploration, CO 2 sequestration, and geothermal energy development. Current techniques, such as multimineral petrophysical analysis, offer details into mineralogical distribution. However, it is inherently time-intensive and demands substantial geological expertise for accurate model evaluation. Furthermore, traditional machine learning techniques often struggle to predict mineralogy accurately and sometimes produce estimations that violate fundamental physical principles. To address this, we present a new approach using Physics-Integrated Neural Networks (PINNs), that combines data-driven learning with domain-specific physical constraints, embedding petrophysical relationships directly into the neural network architecture. This approach enforces that predictions adhere to physical laws. The methodology is applied to the Broom Creek Deep Saline aquifer, a CO 2 sequestration site in the Williston Basin, to predict the volumes of key mineral constituents—quartz, dolomite, feldspar, anhydrite, illite—along with porosity. Compared to traditional artificial neural networks (ANN), the PINN approach demonstrates higher accuracy and better generalizability, significantly enhancing predictive performance on unseen well datasets. The average mean error across the three blind wells is 0.123 for ANN and 0.042 for PINN, highlighting the superior accuracy of the PINN approach. This method reduces uncertainties in reservoir characterization by improving the reliability of mineralogy and porosity predictions, providing a more robust tool for decision-making in various subsurface geoscience applications. • Petrophysical equations and theoretical bounds are effectively integrated into artificial neural networks (ANN). • Physics-Integrated Neural Networks (PINN) evaluate the Broom Creek Deep Saline Aquifer for CO 2 sequestration. • PINN outperforms traditional ANN in predicting mineralogy and porosity, improving generalization.

Energy GeoscienceVol. 6(2)
University of North Dakota (US)
North Dakota Industrial Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
13.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.