Effects of intermixing native and non-native conifers in beech forests on ground beetle diversity and biomass

Effects of intermixing native and non-native conifers in beech forests on ground beetle diversity and biomass -Over the past decades, the North American Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) has been increasingly planted in central Europe as a possible alternative to Norway spruce, due to an expected better adaptation to climate change and higher resilience to forest pests.However, mixed results have been reported on ecological impact, especially concerning effects on forest-associated biodiversity.In this context, particularly the effects of planting non-native tree species in local-scale mixtures with native tree species or mosaic mixtures of pure stands in the landscape remains poorly understood.We sampled ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and analysed their biomass and diversity patterns in five stand types, comprising monocultures of the non-native conifer Douglas fir, the native conifer Norway spruce (Picea abies), and the deciduous European beech (Fagus sylvatica), as well as mixtures of beech with each of the two conifer species, across four sites in Lower Saxony in Germany.Our results show that non-native conifer stands supported the highest ground beetle biomass.Furthermore, admixing conifers with beech can promote stand-level ground beetle diversity and biomass compared to pure beech stands, and that coniferous stands particularly benefitted ground beetle species with larger body size.However, pure stands of beech showed higher turnover of ground beetle species across stands than the more homogeneous species composition across pure stands of the two conifer species, indicating that forest management benefitting landscape-level biodiversity needs to be aware of potential scale-dependent effects of tree species identities on biodiversity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Angewandte Carabidologie
Published
2025-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54336/ac1502
Primary Topic
Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of intermixing native and non-native conifers in beech forests on ground beetle diversity and biomass

Dragan Matevski, Andreas Schuldt, Peter Kriegel
Angewandte Carabidologie
Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
article

Effects of intermixing native and non-native conifers in beech forests on ground beetle diversity and biomass

Dragan Matevski, Andreas Schuldt, Peter Kriegel
article en

Abstract

Effects of intermixing native and non-native conifers in beech forests on ground beetle diversity and biomass -Over the past decades, the North American Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) has been increasingly planted in central Europe as a possible alternative to Norway spruce, due to an expected better adaptation to climate change and higher resilience to forest pests.However, mixed results have been reported on ecological impact, especially concerning effects on forest-associated biodiversity.In this context, particularly the effects of planting non-native tree species in local-scale mixtures with native tree species or mosaic mixtures of pure stands in the landscape remains poorly understood.We sampled ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and analysed their biomass and diversity patterns in five stand types, comprising monocultures of the non-native conifer Douglas fir, the native conifer Norway spruce (Picea abies), and the deciduous European beech (Fagus sylvatica), as well as mixtures of beech with each of the two conifer species, across four sites in Lower Saxony in Germany.Our results show that non-native conifer stands supported the highest ground beetle biomass.Furthermore, admixing conifers with beech can promote stand-level ground beetle diversity and biomass compared to pure beech stands, and that coniferous stands particularly benefitted ground beetle species with larger body size.However, pure stands of beech showed higher turnover of ground beetle species across stands than the more homogeneous species composition across pure stands of the two conifer species, indicating that forest management benefitting landscape-level biodiversity needs to be aware of potential scale-dependent effects of tree species identities on biodiversity.

Angewandte Carabidologie
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.