ASSESSMENT OF THE POTENTIALLY TOXIC EFFECT OF 2% AND 4% ARTICAINE ON THEPATIENTS’ CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM DURING TOOTH EXTRACTION

Aim: The purpose of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis of the potential toxicity of 2% and 4% articaine on the cardiovascualar system of patients during tooth extraction, as well as to assess the risk of complications associated with the use of anesthetics. As part of the study, the tasks were set to assess the toxicity of articaine on cell cultures and analyze hemodynamic changes in patients during the tooth extraction procedure. Materials and Methods: The determination of the half-life concentration (LC50) in an in vitro study was used to assess cytotoxicity.Monitoring of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems was carried out using Mindray ePM 10. Results: A cell culture study confirmed that the 2% drug has significantly lower cytotoxicity than the 4% drug. The monitoring results showed that systolic blood pressure was normal before surgery, with no statistically significant differences between the groups (p>0.05). 2 minutes after the injection of the anesthetic, the pressure remained normal, but after 4 minutes it increased, while in the 2% articaine group it was 3 mmHg lower than in the 4% group (p<0.05). By 8 minutes, the pressure returned to normal values. Dynamics analysis showed a significant increase in systolic blood pressure in both groups by 2 and 4 minutes, followed by a decrease by 8 minutes (p<0.001). Diastolic pressure and pulse also did not show significant differences between the groups, but their dynamics increased in both groups by 4 minutes, followed by a decrease by 8 minutes (p<0.001). Saturation remained normal, but it decreased by 4 minutes with recovery by 8 minutes (p<0.001). Conclusion: The revealed results confirm that 2% articaine is a safe alternative to 4% articaine, especially for patients with concomitant pathologies. The study highlights the need for careful choice of anesthetics in clinical practice to minimize the risk of complications

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BULLETIN OF STOMATOLOGY AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58240/1829006x-2025.3-303
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ASSESSMENT OF THE POTENTIALLY TOXIC EFFECT OF 2% AND 4% ARTICAINE ON THEPATIENTS’ CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM DURING TOOTH EXTRACTION

Natalya Ivanova, Alexey Kuznetsov, Aglaya Kazumova, Yu.L. Vasil’ev
2 citations
BULLETIN OF STOMATOLOGY AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
3.58
article

ASSESSMENT OF THE POTENTIALLY TOXIC EFFECT OF 2% AND 4% ARTICAINE ON THEPATIENTS’ CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM DURING TOOTH EXTRACTION

Natalya Ivanova, Alexey Kuznetsov, Aglaya Kazumova, Yu.L. Vasil’ev
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis of the potential toxicity of 2% and 4% articaine on the cardiovascualar system of patients during tooth extraction, as well as to assess the risk of complications associated with the use of anesthetics. As part of the study, the tasks were set to assess the toxicity of articaine on cell cultures and analyze hemodynamic changes in patients during the tooth extraction procedure. Materials and Methods: The determination of the half-life concentration (LC50) in an in vitro study was used to assess cytotoxicity.Monitoring of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems was carried out using Mindray ePM 10. Results: A cell culture study confirmed that the 2% drug has significantly lower cytotoxicity than the 4% drug. The monitoring results showed that systolic blood pressure was normal before surgery, with no statistically significant differences between the groups (p>0.05). 2 minutes after the injection of the anesthetic, the pressure remained normal, but after 4 minutes it increased, while in the 2% articaine group it was 3 mmHg lower than in the 4% group (p<0.05). By 8 minutes, the pressure returned to normal values. Dynamics analysis showed a significant increase in systolic blood pressure in both groups by 2 and 4 minutes, followed by a decrease by 8 minutes (p<0.001). Diastolic pressure and pulse also did not show significant differences between the groups, but their dynamics increased in both groups by 4 minutes, followed by a decrease by 8 minutes (p<0.001). Saturation remained normal, but it decreased by 4 minutes with recovery by 8 minutes (p<0.001). Conclusion: The revealed results confirm that 2% articaine is a safe alternative to 4% articaine, especially for patients with concomitant pathologies. The study highlights the need for careful choice of anesthetics in clinical practice to minimize the risk of complications

BULLETIN OF STOMATOLOGY AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
Sechenov University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
3.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.