Differences in shoulder belt fit for females versus males measured using upright open magnetic resonance imaging

In comparisons of similar crashes between sexes, females exhibit an elevated risk of injury to the cervical spine and ribs. This preliminary study aims to investigate the relationship between upper body shape and shoulder belt fit, which may provide further insight into sex-based differences in seat belt loading and potential injury patterns. A non-ferromagnetic seat was fabricated for use with an open magnetic resonance (MR) imaging system, as well as a seat belt made of standard automotive webbing material with MR-visible markers. MR scans were acquired for 10 volunteers (5 female, 5 male) in an upright self-selected seat back position. This analysis focused on the shoulder belt positioning relative to the sternum and clavicle, with consideration of soft tissue interactions on this routing. Females in this study exhibited over three times greater range in the distance of the shoulder belt to the top of the sternum (SBD) compared to the males, despite similar or less variability than males in all gross anthropometric measures (SBD range, females: 21-116 mm, males: 51-78 mm). Such differences in variability highlight the diversity in routing patterns that may be influenced by different body geometries, such as breast tissue volume and distribution. Understanding how shoulder belt fit varies among and within diverse occupant populations highlights the need for improving the robustness of restraint design and performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biomechanics
Published
2025-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112676
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in shoulder belt fit for females versus males measured using upright open magnetic resonance imaging

Sarah Romani, Olivia Mergler, Corina Espelien, Peter A. Cripton et al.
1 citations
Journal of Biomechanics
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
2.01
article

Differences in shoulder belt fit for females versus males measured using upright open magnetic resonance imaging

Sarah Romani, Olivia Mergler, Corina Espelien, Peter A. Cripton, Bengt Pipkorn, Gunter P. Siegmund, Carolyn W. Roberts, Paris Vakiel, Jason Forman, Gabrielle R. Booth, Honglin Zhang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In comparisons of similar crashes between sexes, females exhibit an elevated risk of injury to the cervical spine and ribs. This preliminary study aims to investigate the relationship between upper body shape and shoulder belt fit, which may provide further insight into sex-based differences in seat belt loading and potential injury patterns. A non-ferromagnetic seat was fabricated for use with an open magnetic resonance (MR) imaging system, as well as a seat belt made of standard automotive webbing material with MR-visible markers. MR scans were acquired for 10 volunteers (5 female, 5 male) in an upright self-selected seat back position. This analysis focused on the shoulder belt positioning relative to the sternum and clavicle, with consideration of soft tissue interactions on this routing. Females in this study exhibited over three times greater range in the distance of the shoulder belt to the top of the sternum (SBD) compared to the males, despite similar or less variability than males in all gross anthropometric measures (SBD range, females: 21-116 mm, males: 51-78 mm). Such differences in variability highlight the diversity in routing patterns that may be influenced by different body geometries, such as breast tissue volume and distribution. Understanding how shoulder belt fit varies among and within diverse occupant populations highlights the need for improving the robustness of restraint design and performance.

Journal of BiomechanicsVol. 185
Autoliv (Sweden) (SE), American Academy of Forensic Sciences (US), University of British Columbia (CA), Biomechanics Institute of Valencia (ES), For farmers (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.