DAC 6 and the European Rejection of Professional Secrecy Beyond That of Lawyers: The CJEU Judgment of 29 July 2024

The CJUE decided in its judgment of 29 July 2024 in answer to a question of the Belgian Constitutional Court that lawyers but not other persons having the right to represent taxpayers in court could be exempted from the obligation to notify other intermediaries that they were claiming legal privilege exempting them from the obligation to report certain cross-border tax arrangements under DAC 6. They had to inform their clients that this obligation rested on them. Is the exclusion from this right of other professionals subject to professional secrecy under national law justified? The author analyses the opinion of the advocate general and the judgment. He submits that this restriction is not justified in view of the evolution of society and of national legislations. DAC 6 endorsed the judgment and confirmed the exemption as applicable to registered lawyers only.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
EC Tax Review
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2025013
Citations
1
Primary Topic
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DAC 6 and the European Rejection of Professional Secrecy Beyond That of Lawyers: The CJEU Judgment of 29 July 2024

Jacques Malherbe
1 citations
EC Tax Review
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
8.52
article

DAC 6 and the European Rejection of Professional Secrecy Beyond That of Lawyers: The CJEU Judgment of 29 July 2024

Jacques Malherbe
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The CJUE decided in its judgment of 29 July 2024 in answer to a question of the Belgian Constitutional Court that lawyers but not other persons having the right to represent taxpayers in court could be exempted from the obligation to notify other intermediaries that they were claiming legal privilege exempting them from the obligation to report certain cross-border tax arrangements under DAC 6. They had to inform their clients that this obligation rested on them. Is the exclusion from this right of other professionals subject to professional secrecy under national law justified? The author analyses the opinion of the advocate general and the judgment. He submits that this restriction is not justified in view of the evolution of society and of national legislations. DAC 6 endorsed the judgment and confirmed the exemption as applicable to registered lawyers only.

EC Tax ReviewVol. 34(Issue 2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.