Strategies and Considerations for Safe Reinforcement Learning in Programming Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

The programming of cardiac implantable electronic devices, such as pacemakers and implantable defibrillators, represents a promising domain for the application of automated learning systems. These systems, leveraging a type of artificial intelligence called reinforcement learning, have the potential to personalize medical treatment by adapting device settings based on an individual's physiological responses. At the core of these self-learning algorithms is the principle of balancing exploration and exploitation. Exploitation refers to the selection of device programming settings previously demonstrated to provide clinical benefit, while exploration refers to the real-time search for adjustments to device programming that could provide an improvement in clinical outcomes for each individual. Exploration is a critical component of the reinforcement learning algorithm, and provides the opportunity to identify settings that could directly benefit individual patients. However, unconstrained exploration poses risks, as an automated change in certain settings may lead to adverse clinical outcomes. To mitigate these risks, several strategies have been proposed to ensure that algorithm-driven programming changes achieve the desired level of individualized optimization without compromising patient safety. In this review, we examine the existing literature on safe reinforcement learning algorithms in automated systems and discuss their potential application to the programming of cardiac implantable electronic devices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Research Archives
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v13i3.6363
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategies and Considerations for Safe Reinforcement Learning in Programming Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

Ashutosh Trivedi, David Kao, Aaptha Boggaram, John Komp et al.
2 citations
Medical Research Archives
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
2.78
article

Strategies and Considerations for Safe Reinforcement Learning in Programming Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

Ashutosh Trivedi, David Kao, Aaptha Boggaram, John Komp, Michael A. Rosenberg
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The programming of cardiac implantable electronic devices, such as pacemakers and implantable defibrillators, represents a promising domain for the application of automated learning systems. These systems, leveraging a type of artificial intelligence called reinforcement learning, have the potential to personalize medical treatment by adapting device settings based on an individual's physiological responses. At the core of these self-learning algorithms is the principle of balancing exploration and exploitation. Exploitation refers to the selection of device programming settings previously demonstrated to provide clinical benefit, while exploration refers to the real-time search for adjustments to device programming that could provide an improvement in clinical outcomes for each individual. Exploration is a critical component of the reinforcement learning algorithm, and provides the opportunity to identify settings that could directly benefit individual patients. However, unconstrained exploration poses risks, as an automated change in certain settings may lead to adverse clinical outcomes. To mitigate these risks, several strategies have been proposed to ensure that algorithm-driven programming changes achieve the desired level of individualized optimization without compromising patient safety. In this review, we examine the existing literature on safe reinforcement learning algorithms in automated systems and discuss their potential application to the programming of cardiac implantable electronic devices.

Medical Research ArchivesVol. 13(3)
University of Colorado Boulder (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.