Multiscale heat and mass transfer modeling and multi-objective optimization of CO removal in enclosed refuge chambers

• A framework integrates multiscale modeling with NSGA-II for CO removal. • Greater air flow, heating, and smaller particles improve removal but raise costs. • Optimal setup (3 mm particles, GHSV 6327 h⁻¹, ACH 9.7 h⁻¹) met CO reduction standards. • A 33 °C limit was identified as the energy-efficiency threshold for Hopcalite in CO removal. Refuge chambers are critical life-saving installations designed to protect personnel who cannot evacuate during emergencies, where carbon monoxide (CO) can pose a lethal threat. While existing regulations mandate specific CO removal requirements, a theoretical framework for optimizing system design remains underdeveloped. This study addresses this gap by developing a framework that integrates a multiscale heat and mass transfer model spanning catalyst, reactor, and chamber scales, with a multi-objective optimization algorithm. The framework accounts for key parameters such as particle size, gas hourly space velocity (GHSV), air changes per hour (ACH), and heating temperature. Bench-scale and chamber-scale experiments validated the applicability of the multiscale model for real-world scenarios. Using this model, we applied genetic algorithms to optimize system and operational parameters, balancing CO removal capacity with energy consumption to yield Pareto-optimal solutions. For the regulatory requirement of reducing CO from 400 ppm to 24 ppm within 20 min, the optimal energy-efficient setup involved 3 mm catalyst particles, a GHSV of 6327 h⁻¹, and an ACH of 9.7 h⁻¹. In extreme conditions involving severe CO leakage or catalyst deactivation, heating is an effective supplementary measure. However, for the investigated Hopcalite catalysts, temperatures above 33 °C result in disproportionately high energy costs. These findings provide a comprehensive framework for designing efficient CO abatement systems in enclosed refuge chambers, ensuring compliance with safety standards while optimizing operational performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
Published
2025-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2025.127045
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Safety and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.76

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiscale heat and mass transfer modeling and multi-objective optimization of CO removal in enclosed refuge chambers

Dong Fang Yang, Miao Wu, Lumeng Liu, Lin Chen
1 citations
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
Safety and Risk Management
2.76
article

Multiscale heat and mass transfer modeling and multi-objective optimization of CO removal in enclosed refuge chambers

Dong Fang Yang, Miao Wu, Lumeng Liu, Lin Chen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• A framework integrates multiscale modeling with NSGA-II for CO removal. • Greater air flow, heating, and smaller particles improve removal but raise costs. • Optimal setup (3 mm particles, GHSV 6327 h⁻¹, ACH 9.7 h⁻¹) met CO reduction standards. • A 33 °C limit was identified as the energy-efficiency threshold for Hopcalite in CO removal. Refuge chambers are critical life-saving installations designed to protect personnel who cannot evacuate during emergencies, where carbon monoxide (CO) can pose a lethal threat. While existing regulations mandate specific CO removal requirements, a theoretical framework for optimizing system design remains underdeveloped. This study addresses this gap by developing a framework that integrates a multiscale heat and mass transfer model spanning catalyst, reactor, and chamber scales, with a multi-objective optimization algorithm. The framework accounts for key parameters such as particle size, gas hourly space velocity (GHSV), air changes per hour (ACH), and heating temperature. Bench-scale and chamber-scale experiments validated the applicability of the multiscale model for real-world scenarios. Using this model, we applied genetic algorithms to optimize system and operational parameters, balancing CO removal capacity with energy consumption to yield Pareto-optimal solutions. For the regulatory requirement of reducing CO from 400 ppm to 24 ppm within 20 min, the optimal energy-efficient setup involved 3 mm catalyst particles, a GHSV of 6327 h⁻¹, and an ACH of 9.7 h⁻¹. In extreme conditions involving severe CO leakage or catalyst deactivation, heating is an effective supplementary measure. However, for the investigated Hopcalite catalysts, temperatures above 33 °C result in disproportionately high energy costs. These findings provide a comprehensive framework for designing efficient CO abatement systems in enclosed refuge chambers, ensuring compliance with safety standards while optimizing operational performance.

International Journal of Heat and Mass TransferVol. 246
Chongqing University (CN), China University of Geosciences (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Safety and Risk Management
2.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.