Is team commitment related to dialogue about corporate purpose?

This paper examines the relationship between communication regarding a firm's purpose between a team leader and individual team members (referred to as “purpose dialogue”) and the resulting levels of team commitment. We hypothesize that increased dialogue about purpose will lead to higher team commitment by enhancing consensus on the team's tasks and objectives. We also expect that this relationship will be negatively moderated by the variation in leader-member exchange quality (that undermines this consensus) and positively by autonomy given by leaders to individual team members (which reinforces it.) Using data from 469 firms and 57,440 individual observations, we find support for our hypotheses across different specifications. This paper contributes to research on corporate purpose at the team level, leader-member exchange theory, and management practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Long Range Planning
Published
2025-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2025.102531
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is team commitment related to dialogue about corporate purpose?

Rodolphe Durand, Pauline Asmar
3 citations
Long Range Planning
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
8.29
article

Is team commitment related to dialogue about corporate purpose?

Rodolphe Durand, Pauline Asmar
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between communication regarding a firm's purpose between a team leader and individual team members (referred to as “purpose dialogue”) and the resulting levels of team commitment. We hypothesize that increased dialogue about purpose will lead to higher team commitment by enhancing consensus on the team's tasks and objectives. We also expect that this relationship will be negatively moderated by the variation in leader-member exchange quality (that undermines this consensus) and positively by autonomy given by leaders to individual team members (which reinforces it.) Using data from 469 firms and 57,440 individual observations, we find support for our hypotheses across different specifications. This paper contributes to research on corporate purpose at the team level, leader-member exchange theory, and management practice.

Long Range PlanningVol. 58(4)
Sustainability Institute (ZA)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
8.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.