Visual search is relational without prior context learning

The most prominent models of visual attention assume that we tune attention to the specific feature value of a sought-after object (e.g., a specific colour or orientation) to aid search. However, subsequent research has shown that attention is often tuned to the relative feature of the target, that the target has in relation to other items in the surround (e.g., redder/greener, darker/lighter, larger/smaller), in line with a Relational Account of Attention. Previous research is still limited though, as it used repeated-target designs and relatively sparse displays. With this, it is still unknown whether we can indeed tune attention to relative features prior to the first eye movement, or whether this requires context knowledge gained from experience. Moreover, it is unclear how search progresses from one item to the next. The present study tested these questions in a 36-item search display with multiple distractors and variable target and non-target colours. The first fixations on a trial showed that these displays still reliably evoked relational search, even when observers had no knowledge of the context. Moreover, the first five fixations within a trial showed that we tend to select the most extreme items first, followed by the next-extreme, until the target is found, in line with the relational account. These findings show that information about the relative target feature can be rapidly extracted and is used to guide attention in the first fixation(s) of search, whereby attention only hones in on the target colour after multiple fixations on relatively more extreme distractors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognition
Published
2025-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106132
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visual search is relational without prior context learning

Koralalage Don Raveen Amarasekera, Stefanie I. Becker, Zachary Hamblin-Frohman
2 citations
Cognition
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
2.86
article

Visual search is relational without prior context learning

Koralalage Don Raveen Amarasekera, Stefanie I. Becker, Zachary Hamblin-Frohman
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The most prominent models of visual attention assume that we tune attention to the specific feature value of a sought-after object (e.g., a specific colour or orientation) to aid search. However, subsequent research has shown that attention is often tuned to the relative feature of the target, that the target has in relation to other items in the surround (e.g., redder/greener, darker/lighter, larger/smaller), in line with a Relational Account of Attention. Previous research is still limited though, as it used repeated-target designs and relatively sparse displays. With this, it is still unknown whether we can indeed tune attention to relative features prior to the first eye movement, or whether this requires context knowledge gained from experience. Moreover, it is unclear how search progresses from one item to the next. The present study tested these questions in a 36-item search display with multiple distractors and variable target and non-target colours. The first fixations on a trial showed that these displays still reliably evoked relational search, even when observers had no knowledge of the context. Moreover, the first five fixations within a trial showed that we tend to select the most extreme items first, followed by the next-extreme, until the target is found, in line with the relational account. These findings show that information about the relative target feature can be rapidly extracted and is used to guide attention in the first fixation(s) of search, whereby attention only hones in on the target colour after multiple fixations on relatively more extreme distractors.

CognitionVol. 260
The University of Queensland (AU)
Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.