How Do Banks Respond to Supplier IPOs?

ABSTRACT This paper examines how supplier IPO events affect their key customers’ cost of debt. The evidence reveals that average loan spreads for customers increase by roughly 20% (23.7 basis points) following suppliers’ IPO events. This negative spillover effect is more pronounced when suppliers make significant relationship‐specific investments (high switching cost), when suppliers face less concentrated customer bases, or when customers face more concentrated supplier bases. Our results show that customers receive less favourable trade terms and are forced to pay more for inputs after their suppliers go public, all of which increase customers’ operational costs, risk and subsequent borrowing costs. Furthermore, we document that customer loan contracts become significantly more restrictive after a supplier's IPO. Finally, we find that the observed negative spillover effect is also present in customers’ access to the public bond market.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Financial Markets Institutions and Instruments
Published
2025-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/fmii.12212
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Do Banks Respond to Supplier IPOs?

Sung C. Bae, Iftekhar Hasan, Liuling Liu, Haizhi Wang
1 citations
Financial Markets Institutions and Instruments
Corporate Finance and Governance
3.91
article

How Do Banks Respond to Supplier IPOs?

Sung C. Bae, Iftekhar Hasan, Liuling Liu, Haizhi Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines how supplier IPO events affect their key customers’ cost of debt. The evidence reveals that average loan spreads for customers increase by roughly 20% (23.7 basis points) following suppliers’ IPO events. This negative spillover effect is more pronounced when suppliers make significant relationship‐specific investments (high switching cost), when suppliers face less concentrated customer bases, or when customers face more concentrated supplier bases. Our results show that customers receive less favourable trade terms and are forced to pay more for inputs after their suppliers go public, all of which increase customers’ operational costs, risk and subsequent borrowing costs. Furthermore, we document that customer loan contracts become significantly more restrictive after a supplier's IPO. Finally, we find that the observed negative spillover effect is also present in customers’ access to the public bond market.

Financial Markets Institutions and InstrumentsVol. 34(3)
Bowling Green State University (US), Fordham University (US), Illinois Institute of Technology (US), Bank of Finland (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Corporate Finance and Governance
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.