Conventionalization and legitimization of lexical borrowings (on the example of the English-Korean language pair)

Lexical borrowings are considered to be one of the most widespread manifestations of linguistic interference. The linguistic innovations identified in the context of linguistic interference are associated with the transformation of existing knowledge structures that are shared within society and are influenced by socio-cultural phenomena. The different ways in which linguistic interference is fixed in the consciousness of speakers of the receiving language are also reflected in the nature of codification. Therefore, systemic interference results in the transfer and consolidation of knowledge structures in the general fund of knowledge about language (fixation in dictionaries and grammars as a linguistic norm, i.e. legitimisation). Meanwhile, functional interference does not always imply fixation in the general fund of knowledge as a linguistic norm and correlates with legitimisation (i.e. social codification). The purpose of this article is to study the mechanisms and specifics of codification processes of lexical borrowings in the language pair of Korean (South Korean variant) and English. It is important to note the marked asymmetry observed in both lexical borrowing processes (in terms of the number of borrowings recorded in dictionaries and the range of knowledge fields in which new words are borrowed) and codification processes in this language pair. The Republic of Korea has demonstrated a clear commitment to the active legitimisation and conventionalisation of Anglicisms within the national language. This phenomenon is widely considered to be a reflection of the significant role of English as a source of neologisation, as well as the intensity of interference occurring in the English→Korean direction. The Merriam-Webster Dictionary has recorded a small number of Korean loanwords in the USA (less than 0.01% of the total number of dictionary entries). However, the increasing processes of social codification attracted by the influence of the phenomena known as the Korean wave .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University History Political Science Law
Published
2025-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25587/2222-5404-2025-22-1-126-137
Primary Topic
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conventionalization and legitimization of lexical borrowings (on the example of the English-Korean language pair)

Т С Мозоль
Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University History Political Science Law
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
article

Conventionalization and legitimization of lexical borrowings (on the example of the English-Korean language pair)

Т С Мозоль
article en

Abstract

Lexical borrowings are considered to be one of the most widespread manifestations of linguistic interference. The linguistic innovations identified in the context of linguistic interference are associated with the transformation of existing knowledge structures that are shared within society and are influenced by socio-cultural phenomena. The different ways in which linguistic interference is fixed in the consciousness of speakers of the receiving language are also reflected in the nature of codification. Therefore, systemic interference results in the transfer and consolidation of knowledge structures in the general fund of knowledge about language (fixation in dictionaries and grammars as a linguistic norm, i.e. legitimisation). Meanwhile, functional interference does not always imply fixation in the general fund of knowledge as a linguistic norm and correlates with legitimisation (i.e. social codification). The purpose of this article is to study the mechanisms and specifics of codification processes of lexical borrowings in the language pair of Korean (South Korean variant) and English. It is important to note the marked asymmetry observed in both lexical borrowing processes (in terms of the number of borrowings recorded in dictionaries and the range of knowledge fields in which new words are borrowed) and codification processes in this language pair. The Republic of Korea has demonstrated a clear commitment to the active legitimisation and conventionalisation of Anglicisms within the national language. This phenomenon is widely considered to be a reflection of the significant role of English as a source of neologisation, as well as the intensity of interference occurring in the English→Korean direction. The Merriam-Webster Dictionary has recorded a small number of Korean loanwords in the USA (less than 0.01% of the total number of dictionary entries). However, the increasing processes of social codification attracted by the influence of the phenomena known as the Korean wave .

Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University History Political Science LawVol. 22(1)
Moscow State Linguistic University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Conventionalization and legitimization of lexical borrowings (on the example of the English-Korean language pair) — Т С Мозоль · Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University History Political Science Law (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS