Performance assessment of personal care products industrial effluent treatment plant and its impacts on the environment

• The WWTP was very poorly managed, which could reduce only 15.5% of COD and 24.4% of BOD 5 . • The discharged effluent contained several EDCs along with heavy metals. • Demonstrated the effects of ionic product and solubility product constant, pH, and complexation on the performance of WWTP. • Conceptualized a new phosphate recovery process from sludge. Personal care products (PCPs) are emerging pollutants (EPs) that are capable of inducing adverse physiological effects on human health. PCPs industries generate a large volume of EPs that pose a significant threat to the aquatic environment. This study assessed PCPs industrial wastewater for physicochemical parameters, EPs, heavy metals (HMs), and the removal efficiency of a biochemical wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in three different seasons. The study also assessed the environmental impacts using several indices, such as the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment water quality index ( CCME-WQI ), heavy metal pollution index ( HPI ), heavy metal evaluation index ( HEI ), and risk quotients index ( RQ s). The analysis results showed that the WWTP could reduce only 15.5 % and 24.4 % of COD and BOD 5 , respectively, leaving a very high value of 468.3 and 249.9 mg/L, respectively, compared to the ECR (2023 ) standard. The removal rates for the HMs were in the order of Mn (5.7 %) < Cr (10.4 %) < Zn (20.0 %) < Ni (23.5 %) < Cd (59.4 %) < Cu (61.9 %) < Fe (73.1 %) < Pb (88.7 %). The discharged effluent contained a number of EPs and HMs, which were poor in quality, unsafe for consumption, and high in environmental risk. Acidic pH and low phosphate concentration in the biological process were found to be the key determining factors for the worst performance of the WWTP, though metal–ligand interaction was assumed to have some contribution. The phosphate recovery concept formulated in this study is assumed to be simple and straight-forward. The study argued that if some important parameters, such as pH, phosphate concentration, etc. are maintained properly, the studied biochemical treatment process can be effective for removing both PCPs and HMs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Watershed Ecology and the Environment
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsee.2025.03.007
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance assessment of personal care products industrial effluent treatment plant and its impacts on the environment

M. G. Mostafa, Md. Anowar Hossen
1 citations
Watershed Ecology and the Environment
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
0.82
article

Performance assessment of personal care products industrial effluent treatment plant and its impacts on the environment

M. G. Mostafa, Md. Anowar Hossen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• The WWTP was very poorly managed, which could reduce only 15.5% of COD and 24.4% of BOD 5 . • The discharged effluent contained several EDCs along with heavy metals. • Demonstrated the effects of ionic product and solubility product constant, pH, and complexation on the performance of WWTP. • Conceptualized a new phosphate recovery process from sludge. Personal care products (PCPs) are emerging pollutants (EPs) that are capable of inducing adverse physiological effects on human health. PCPs industries generate a large volume of EPs that pose a significant threat to the aquatic environment. This study assessed PCPs industrial wastewater for physicochemical parameters, EPs, heavy metals (HMs), and the removal efficiency of a biochemical wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in three different seasons. The study also assessed the environmental impacts using several indices, such as the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment water quality index ( CCME-WQI ), heavy metal pollution index ( HPI ), heavy metal evaluation index ( HEI ), and risk quotients index ( RQ s). The analysis results showed that the WWTP could reduce only 15.5 % and 24.4 % of COD and BOD 5 , respectively, leaving a very high value of 468.3 and 249.9 mg/L, respectively, compared to the ECR (2023 ) standard. The removal rates for the HMs were in the order of Mn (5.7 %) < Cr (10.4 %) < Zn (20.0 %) < Ni (23.5 %) < Cd (59.4 %) < Cu (61.9 %) < Fe (73.1 %) < Pb (88.7 %). The discharged effluent contained a number of EPs and HMs, which were poor in quality, unsafe for consumption, and high in environmental risk. Acidic pH and low phosphate concentration in the biological process were found to be the key determining factors for the worst performance of the WWTP, though metal–ligand interaction was assumed to have some contribution. The phosphate recovery concept formulated in this study is assumed to be simple and straight-forward. The study argued that if some important parameters, such as pH, phosphate concentration, etc. are maintained properly, the studied biochemical treatment process can be effective for removing both PCPs and HMs.

Watershed Ecology and the EnvironmentVol. 7
University of Rajshahi (BD)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.