Driving change? Exploring the role of socio-technical experiments in shaping autonomous mobility transitions

• Discusses the role of socio-technical experiments for autonomous driving and their potential to shape mobility transitions. • Identifies a general low case-reporting and weak conceptual linkages to the transition literature. • Emphasizes the need for continuous participatory approaches to induce changes in governance. • Advocates for a broader perspective on experiments as a method to foster transformative change. • Outlines future research avenues and major fields of action to enhance meaningful experimentation. This systematic literature review inquires into the role of socio-technical experiments for autonomous driving and their potential to shape mobility transitions towards sustainability. As an emerging technology in an early stage of transition, AVs are increasingly being tested in different spatial contexts with diverse actor constellations in order to enhance the technology further. This article critically examines the added value of these experiments, how they affect the scaling-up of autonomous driving, and highlights key themes that researchers and practitioners should consider when designing experiments. The most striking aspect of our sample is the lack of continuous participatory methods, as well as weak linkages to the transition literature. Reflecting upon how existing experiments link to the core characteristics of socio-technical experiments, we derive central findings for future research avenues: Scaling-up of AVs requires greater involvement of policymakers and enhanced place-specific approaches, while comprehensive co-design experimentation relies on robust, long-term research infrastructures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
Published
2025-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2025.100993
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Driving change? Exploring the role of socio-technical experiments in shaping autonomous mobility transitions

Alexey Vinel, Daniel J. Lang, Jens Schippl, Tim Fraske et al.
1 citations
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
article

Driving change? Exploring the role of socio-technical experiments in shaping autonomous mobility transitions

Alexey Vinel, Daniel J. Lang, Jens Schippl, Tim Fraske, Annika Weiser, Maximilian Schrapel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Discusses the role of socio-technical experiments for autonomous driving and their potential to shape mobility transitions. • Identifies a general low case-reporting and weak conceptual linkages to the transition literature. • Emphasizes the need for continuous participatory approaches to induce changes in governance. • Advocates for a broader perspective on experiments as a method to foster transformative change. • Outlines future research avenues and major fields of action to enhance meaningful experimentation. This systematic literature review inquires into the role of socio-technical experiments for autonomous driving and their potential to shape mobility transitions towards sustainability. As an emerging technology in an early stage of transition, AVs are increasingly being tested in different spatial contexts with diverse actor constellations in order to enhance the technology further. This article critically examines the added value of these experiments, how they affect the scaling-up of autonomous driving, and highlights key themes that researchers and practitioners should consider when designing experiments. The most striking aspect of our sample is the lack of continuous participatory methods, as well as weak linkages to the transition literature. Reflecting upon how existing experiments link to the core characteristics of socio-technical experiments, we derive central findings for future research avenues: Scaling-up of AVs requires greater involvement of policymakers and enhanced place-specific approaches, while comprehensive co-design experimentation relies on robust, long-term research infrastructures.

Environmental Innovation and Societal TransitionsVol. 56
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.