Bringing content into the equation: Using a wordscores method to compare the effect of newspaper and television on vote choice in referendums

Citizens often lack policy-specific knowledge to cast a well-informed vote in a direct democratic ballot. To fill this information gap, citizens rely on the media to find policy arguments. With that in mind, this article compares the effect of newspapers and television on vote choice in a referendum. It is the first attempt to use the same method, i. e., a Wordscores content analysis, to position newspaper outlets and television format on a No–Yes scale within the same direct democratic campaign. Indeed, by linking this content analysis with a three-wave online panel survey (N = 686) this method considers the divergent influence of newspapers and television on vote choice. A panel model identifies a positive effect of newspapers on the vote choice of those who consume newspapers intensively. Alternatively, the model detects a positive effect of television content on vote choice, but only for citizens with low political awareness. In the end, this paper extends the literature on the importance of systematic reasoning in direct democratic votes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Communication Sciences
Published
2025-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2025.01.5050
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bringing content into the equation: Using a wordscores method to compare the effect of newspaper and television on vote choice in referendums

Guillaume Zumofen
Studies in Communication Sciences
Social Media and Politics
article

Bringing content into the equation: Using a wordscores method to compare the effect of newspaper and television on vote choice in referendums

Guillaume Zumofen
article en

Abstract

Citizens often lack policy-specific knowledge to cast a well-informed vote in a direct democratic ballot. To fill this information gap, citizens rely on the media to find policy arguments. With that in mind, this article compares the effect of newspapers and television on vote choice in a referendum. It is the first attempt to use the same method, i. e., a Wordscores content analysis, to position newspaper outlets and television format on a No–Yes scale within the same direct democratic campaign. Indeed, by linking this content analysis with a three-wave online panel survey (N = 686) this method considers the divergent influence of newspapers and television on vote choice. A panel model identifies a positive effect of newspapers on the vote choice of those who consume newspapers intensively. Alternatively, the model detects a positive effect of television content on vote choice, but only for citizens with low political awareness. In the end, this paper extends the literature on the importance of systematic reasoning in direct democratic votes.

Studies in Communication SciencesVol. 25(1)
University of Bern (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.