Constructing Bayesian optimal designs for discrete choice experiments by simulated annealing

Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) investigate the attributes that influence individuals’ choices when selecting among various options. To enhance the quality of the estimated choice models, researchers opt for Bayesian optimal designs that utilize existing information about the attributes’ preferences. Given the nonlinear nature of choice models, the construction of an appropriate design requires efficient algorithms. Among these, the coordinate-exchange (CE) algorithm is commonly employed for constructing designs based on the MNL model. However, as a hill-climbing method, the CE algorithm tends to quickly converge to local optima, potentially limiting the quality of the resulting designs. We propose the use of a simulated annealing (SA) algorithm to construct Bayesian optimal designs. This algorithm accepts both superior and inferior solutions, avoiding premature convergence and allowing a more thorough exploration of potential solutions. Consequently, it ultimately obtains higher-quality choice designs compared to the CE algorithm. Our work represents the first application of an SA algorithm in constructing Bayesian optimal designs for DCEs. Through extensive computational experiments, we demonstrate that the SA designs generally outperform the CE designs in terms of statistical efficiency, especially when the prior preference information is highly uncertain. • First use of simulated annealing (SA) for constructing Bayesian optimal choice designs. • Recommendations for selecting SA algorithm parameters in choice designs. • SA designs generally outperform designs generated by coordinate exchange.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Choice Modelling
Published
2025-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2025.100551
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Optimal Experimental Design Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constructing Bayesian optimal designs for discrete choice experiments by simulated annealing

Yicheng Mao, Roselinde Kessels, Tom C. van der Zanden
3 citations
Journal of Choice Modelling
Optimal Experimental Design Methods
6.32
article

Constructing Bayesian optimal designs for discrete choice experiments by simulated annealing

Yicheng Mao, Roselinde Kessels, Tom C. van der Zanden
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) investigate the attributes that influence individuals’ choices when selecting among various options. To enhance the quality of the estimated choice models, researchers opt for Bayesian optimal designs that utilize existing information about the attributes’ preferences. Given the nonlinear nature of choice models, the construction of an appropriate design requires efficient algorithms. Among these, the coordinate-exchange (CE) algorithm is commonly employed for constructing designs based on the MNL model. However, as a hill-climbing method, the CE algorithm tends to quickly converge to local optima, potentially limiting the quality of the resulting designs. We propose the use of a simulated annealing (SA) algorithm to construct Bayesian optimal designs. This algorithm accepts both superior and inferior solutions, avoiding premature convergence and allowing a more thorough exploration of potential solutions. Consequently, it ultimately obtains higher-quality choice designs compared to the CE algorithm. Our work represents the first application of an SA algorithm in constructing Bayesian optimal designs for DCEs. Through extensive computational experiments, we demonstrate that the SA designs generally outperform the CE designs in terms of statistical efficiency, especially when the prior preference information is highly uncertain. • First use of simulated annealing (SA) for constructing Bayesian optimal choice designs. • Recommendations for selecting SA algorithm parameters in choice designs. • SA designs generally outperform designs generated by coordinate exchange.

Journal of Choice ModellingVol. 55
University of Antwerp (BE), Maastricht University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Optimal Experimental Design Methods
6.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.