Integrating geological model via A multimodal machine learning approach in shale gas production forecast

Machine learning (ML) has achieved great success in production prediction for unconventional shale gas reservoirs. However, these methods mostly rely on the discrete data collected from the wells, such as drilling, completion, and production data. In this study, a multimodal ML approach is proposed to incorporate not only the aforementioned tabular data but also the geological property distribution maps surrounding the production wells. More specifically, a visual parameterization method was applied to preprocess the unstructured data from a 3D geological model to account for the geology properties near the horizontal wells. A comprehensive architecture for a multimodal model was then developed, assimilating a convolutional neural network (CNN) module, an artificial neural network (ANN) module, and a fusion module. The CNN module was established to process and extract high-level information from the visual dataset, while the ANN module was devised to learn from traditional tabular datasets. A fusion module combined and interacted with the data from both modalities. Results have shown that the proposed multimodal model achieved the highest testing R 2 of 0.828 by integrating the formation maps with tabular datasets, compared to 0.736 from ANN. This is owing to the fact that two wells with similar porosity values measured at well sites could penetrate formations with different qualities along their thousand meters of lateral length. Visual feature analysis indicates that while integrating more property distribution maps generally increases model accuracy, considerable improvement (from 0.736 to 0.816) is achieved by solely incorporating porosity maps. • Incorporating geological maps by multimodal architecture raises R 2 from 0.74 to 0.83. • Significant improvement can be achieved by solely incorporating porosity maps. • An optimal width exists for geo-patching to maximize model performance. • Alignment test validates synchronization between tabular and visual datasets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gas Science and Engineering
Published
2025-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgsce.2025.205617
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating geological model via A multimodal machine learning approach in shale gas production forecast

Xialin Zhang, Gang Hui, Muming Wang, Shengnan Chen et al.
7 citations
Gas Science and Engineering
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
8.02
article

Integrating geological model via A multimodal machine learning approach in shale gas production forecast

Xialin Zhang, Gang Hui, Muming Wang, Shengnan Chen, Hai Wang
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) has achieved great success in production prediction for unconventional shale gas reservoirs. However, these methods mostly rely on the discrete data collected from the wells, such as drilling, completion, and production data. In this study, a multimodal ML approach is proposed to incorporate not only the aforementioned tabular data but also the geological property distribution maps surrounding the production wells. More specifically, a visual parameterization method was applied to preprocess the unstructured data from a 3D geological model to account for the geology properties near the horizontal wells. A comprehensive architecture for a multimodal model was then developed, assimilating a convolutional neural network (CNN) module, an artificial neural network (ANN) module, and a fusion module. The CNN module was established to process and extract high-level information from the visual dataset, while the ANN module was devised to learn from traditional tabular datasets. A fusion module combined and interacted with the data from both modalities. Results have shown that the proposed multimodal model achieved the highest testing R 2 of 0.828 by integrating the formation maps with tabular datasets, compared to 0.736 from ANN. This is owing to the fact that two wells with similar porosity values measured at well sites could penetrate formations with different qualities along their thousand meters of lateral length. Visual feature analysis indicates that while integrating more property distribution maps generally increases model accuracy, considerable improvement (from 0.736 to 0.816) is achieved by solely incorporating porosity maps. • Incorporating geological maps by multimodal architecture raises R 2 from 0.74 to 0.83. • Significant improvement can be achieved by solely incorporating porosity maps. • An optimal width exists for geo-patching to maximize model performance. • Alignment test validates synchronization between tabular and visual datasets.

Gas Science and EngineeringVol. 139
University of Calgary (CA), China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN), Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development (CN)
China Scholarship Council, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
8.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.