Stakeholder perspectives on integrating Ayurveda and Indian Indigenous Knowledge Systems into higher education: An exploratory study

The renewed emphasis on mainstreaming Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) in higher education globally, including in India, has sparked interest in leveraging traditional teaching methodologies for holistic learner development. However, integrating IKS into existing curricula requires a nuanced understanding of stakeholder perceptions and an appraisal of the challenges and opportunities within current educational frameworks. This paper presents the findings of a qualitative study examining stakeholders' perspectives on integrating Indian IKS, with a particular focus on the indigenous medicine system, Ayurveda, into higher education health and nutrition science curricula. Interviews, focus groups, and panel discussions were conducted with administrators, educators, learners, and subject experts to identify barriers and develop strategies for successful integration. Results revealed that educators were “convinced but not confident” about content and pedagogy, learners were “unsure” about the relevance of IKS for their future careers, and administrators expressed concerns about bridging the gap between traditional and modern scientific perspectives. Thematic analysis identified five actionable strategies: 1) Stakeholder training and capacity building to reduce implementation hesitancy, 2) Curricular design and restructuring to incorporate discipline-specific IKS courses and integration models, 3) Pedagogical innovations such as real-life simulations, experiential learning, and reflective evaluation, 4) Student sensitization and resource generation to meet learner needs and expectations, and 5) Interdisciplinary collaboration and research to build evidence regarding the efficacy and applicability of IKS practices in addressing present-day challenges. These insights provide unique stakeholder perspectives on the ongoing deliberations about mainstreaming IKS and creating a synergistic framework that enhances learners’ intellectual, cultural, and practical competencies. • The perceptions regarding integration of IKS into higher education were explored. • Interviews and focus groups were conducted among educators, learners and experts. • The results revealed interest but implementation hesitancy in stakeholders. • Curricular interventions, sensitization and collaboration emerged as opportunities. • Explicit policies, instructional strategies and teacher trainings are required. • The study provided a comprehensive, critical analysis of stakeholder viewpoints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101453
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stakeholder perspectives on integrating Ayurveda and Indian Indigenous Knowledge Systems into higher education: An exploratory study

Jagmeet Madan, Panchali Moitra
1 citations
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Agriculture
1.75
article

Stakeholder perspectives on integrating Ayurveda and Indian Indigenous Knowledge Systems into higher education: An exploratory study

Jagmeet Madan, Panchali Moitra
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The renewed emphasis on mainstreaming Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) in higher education globally, including in India, has sparked interest in leveraging traditional teaching methodologies for holistic learner development. However, integrating IKS into existing curricula requires a nuanced understanding of stakeholder perceptions and an appraisal of the challenges and opportunities within current educational frameworks. This paper presents the findings of a qualitative study examining stakeholders' perspectives on integrating Indian IKS, with a particular focus on the indigenous medicine system, Ayurveda, into higher education health and nutrition science curricula. Interviews, focus groups, and panel discussions were conducted with administrators, educators, learners, and subject experts to identify barriers and develop strategies for successful integration. Results revealed that educators were “convinced but not confident” about content and pedagogy, learners were “unsure” about the relevance of IKS for their future careers, and administrators expressed concerns about bridging the gap between traditional and modern scientific perspectives. Thematic analysis identified five actionable strategies: 1) Stakeholder training and capacity building to reduce implementation hesitancy, 2) Curricular design and restructuring to incorporate discipline-specific IKS courses and integration models, 3) Pedagogical innovations such as real-life simulations, experiential learning, and reflective evaluation, 4) Student sensitization and resource generation to meet learner needs and expectations, and 5) Interdisciplinary collaboration and research to build evidence regarding the efficacy and applicability of IKS practices in addressing present-day challenges. These insights provide unique stakeholder perspectives on the ongoing deliberations about mainstreaming IKS and creating a synergistic framework that enhances learners’ intellectual, cultural, and practical competencies. • The perceptions regarding integration of IKS into higher education were explored. • Interviews and focus groups were conducted among educators, learners and experts. • The results revealed interest but implementation hesitancy in stakeholders. • Curricular interventions, sensitization and collaboration emerged as opportunities. • Explicit policies, instructional strategies and teacher trainings are required. • The study provided a comprehensive, critical analysis of stakeholder viewpoints.

Social Sciences & Humanities OpenVol. 11
Shreemati Nathibai Damodar Thackersey Women's University (IN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Agriculture
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.