ICD support groups: Are they still relevant now?

While implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) save lives in patients at risk for potentially life-threatening arrhythmias, ICD shocks may prompt fear and anxiety and cause potential psychological trauma in patients. Since the beginning of the ICD's broad use, healthcare professionals recognized the unique demands and experiences associated with this therapy. Some clinics responded by initiating patient-focused meetings broadly referred to as "ICD support groups" to address the mental health challenges in these patients. Decades of research have now underscored the importance of ICD patients' psychological and behavioral processes and their associations with adverse health outcomes. ICD patients frequently report disease-specific mental health symptoms, including ICD shock anxiety, poor device acceptance, body image concerns, and decreased physical activity, that require unique clinical expertise from professionals to effectively manage. The original impetus for ICD support groups persists, but relatively few ICD support groups remain active. Online offerings may have taken on some of these functions. We suggest that ICD support groups remain a strategic intervention to address patient psychological and lifestyle concerns. This paper reviews the value of ICD support groups in the United States, Australia, and Canada and analyzes the current state and potential value of ICD support groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heart Rhythm O2
Published
2025-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2025.03.021
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ICD support groups: Are they still relevant now?

Ann Kirkness, Lauren A. Rousseau, Samuel F. Sears, Tiffany Andrade et al.
2 citations
Heart Rhythm O2
Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
1.59
article

ICD support groups: Are they still relevant now?

Ann Kirkness, Lauren A. Rousseau, Samuel F. Sears, Tiffany Andrade, Julie B. Shea, Samantha McCrary, Allana Fantin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

While implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) save lives in patients at risk for potentially life-threatening arrhythmias, ICD shocks may prompt fear and anxiety and cause potential psychological trauma in patients. Since the beginning of the ICD's broad use, healthcare professionals recognized the unique demands and experiences associated with this therapy. Some clinics responded by initiating patient-focused meetings broadly referred to as "ICD support groups" to address the mental health challenges in these patients. Decades of research have now underscored the importance of ICD patients' psychological and behavioral processes and their associations with adverse health outcomes. ICD patients frequently report disease-specific mental health symptoms, including ICD shock anxiety, poor device acceptance, body image concerns, and decreased physical activity, that require unique clinical expertise from professionals to effectively manage. The original impetus for ICD support groups persists, but relatively few ICD support groups remain active. Online offerings may have taken on some of these functions. We suggest that ICD support groups remain a strategic intervention to address patient psychological and lifestyle concerns. This paper reviews the value of ICD support groups in the United States, Australia, and Canada and analyzes the current state and potential value of ICD support groups.

Heart Rhythm O2Vol. 6(6)
Alberta Health Services (CA), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), East Carolina University (US), Royal North Shore Hospital (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
1.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.