Unveiling users’ algorithm trust: The role of task objectivity, time pressure, and cognitive load

In the context of artificial intelligence and algorithm-assisted decision-making, understanding dynamics of users' trust in algorithms and its influencing factors is crucial for optimizing human-computer interactions. This study integrates both questionnaires and behavioral experiments to explore the effects of task objectivity, time pressure, and cognitive load on algorithm trust. Study 1 recruited 488 participants to evaluate the perceived objectivity of 24 algorithm-estimated tasks, and revealed a significant positive correlation between perceived task objectivity and algorithm trust. Using a weight estimation task selected by study 1, which was identified as high objectivity and comparable trust in human versus algorithmic decisions, study 2 investigated the algorithm trust of 51 college students under different cognitive loads and time pressures. Results showed that individuals' trust in algorithms increased under time pressure in objective practical choices but significantly decreased in subjective rating afterward. Cognitive load, however, did not significantly impact individual's advice adoption. Study 3 (n = 54) further validated the crucial role of time pressure in shaping algorithm trust and its dynamical changes over time. The study underscored the importance of task objectivity and time pressure on users' algorithm trust, unveiling the cogntive mechamism of task characteristics and contextual factors impacting on the users' alogrithm trust, which provided a theoretical foundation for developers optimize algorithm interaction designs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Computers in Human Behavior Reports
Published
2025-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100667
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unveiling users’ algorithm trust: The role of task objectivity, time pressure, and cognitive load

Haichao Zhao, Qinghua He, Yawei Qi, Jiali Liu et al.
6 citations
Computers in Human Behavior Reports
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
14.63
article

Unveiling users’ algorithm trust: The role of task objectivity, time pressure, and cognitive load

Haichao Zhao, Qinghua He, Yawei Qi, Jiali Liu, Ruoxin Yang, Sisheng Li
article en
6 citations

Abstract

In the context of artificial intelligence and algorithm-assisted decision-making, understanding dynamics of users' trust in algorithms and its influencing factors is crucial for optimizing human-computer interactions. This study integrates both questionnaires and behavioral experiments to explore the effects of task objectivity, time pressure, and cognitive load on algorithm trust. Study 1 recruited 488 participants to evaluate the perceived objectivity of 24 algorithm-estimated tasks, and revealed a significant positive correlation between perceived task objectivity and algorithm trust. Using a weight estimation task selected by study 1, which was identified as high objectivity and comparable trust in human versus algorithmic decisions, study 2 investigated the algorithm trust of 51 college students under different cognitive loads and time pressures. Results showed that individuals' trust in algorithms increased under time pressure in objective practical choices but significantly decreased in subjective rating afterward. Cognitive load, however, did not significantly impact individual's advice adoption. Study 3 (n = 54) further validated the crucial role of time pressure in shaping algorithm trust and its dynamical changes over time. The study underscored the importance of task objectivity and time pressure on users' algorithm trust, unveiling the cogntive mechamism of task characteristics and contextual factors impacting on the users' alogrithm trust, which provided a theoretical foundation for developers optimize algorithm interaction designs.

Computers in Human Behavior ReportsVol. 18
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
14.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.