Reservation In India : Tool For Social Justice And Equality In Education And Government Services

Indian society has long been characterized by structural inequality and discrimination rooted in the caste system. This system, based on principles of purity and pollution, assigns economic and civil rights hierarchically by birth. The Brahmins, Kshatriyas, and Vaishyas occupy the highest positions in this hierarchy, while the so-called lower castes, or "Avarnas," who fall outside the traditional four-fold Varna system, continue to face the stigma of untouchability and social exclusion even today. Although the reservation system was introduced during British rule as result of social reform movements that emerged alongside the freedom struggle, caste-based discrimination persisted. The reservation policy was designed to ensure the inclusion of historically deprived groups by providing quotas in education, government employment, and legislative bodies at both the Union and State levels. On January 26, 1950, the Indian Constitution formally prohibited caste-based discrimination and abolished untouchability. It also empowered the Union and State governments to make special provisions for the advancement of socially and educationally backward communities, particularly Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs). However, since the 1990s, the reservation policy has remained a contentious issue, debated extensively in Parliament, State Assemblies, and the public sphere. This paper examines the implementation of reservations for Scheduled Castes in education and government employment, from primary levels to higher education institutions. It argues that, despite constitutional provisions, the actual beneficiaries among SC communities have not fully received the intended support due to improper implementation of the policy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i02.40173
Primary Topic
Social and Economic Development in India
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reservation In India : Tool For Social Justice And Equality In Education And Government Services

Rushikesh Bhand
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Social and Economic Development in India
article

Reservation In India : Tool For Social Justice And Equality In Education And Government Services

Rushikesh Bhand
article en

Abstract

Indian society has long been characterized by structural inequality and discrimination rooted in the caste system. This system, based on principles of purity and pollution, assigns economic and civil rights hierarchically by birth. The Brahmins, Kshatriyas, and Vaishyas occupy the highest positions in this hierarchy, while the so-called lower castes, or "Avarnas," who fall outside the traditional four-fold Varna system, continue to face the stigma of untouchability and social exclusion even today. Although the reservation system was introduced during British rule as result of social reform movements that emerged alongside the freedom struggle, caste-based discrimination persisted. The reservation policy was designed to ensure the inclusion of historically deprived groups by providing quotas in education, government employment, and legislative bodies at both the Union and State levels. On January 26, 1950, the Indian Constitution formally prohibited caste-based discrimination and abolished untouchability. It also empowered the Union and State governments to make special provisions for the advancement of socially and educationally backward communities, particularly Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs). However, since the 1990s, the reservation policy has remained a contentious issue, debated extensively in Parliament, State Assemblies, and the public sphere. This paper examines the implementation of reservations for Scheduled Castes in education and government employment, from primary levels to higher education institutions. It argues that, despite constitutional provisions, the actual beneficiaries among SC communities have not fully received the intended support due to improper implementation of the policy.

International Journal For Multidisciplinary ResearchVol. 7(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Social and Economic Development in India
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.