The signature of biotic interactions on lake macrophytes differs among seven metacommunities of three continents

Abstract There is a lack of empirical evidence on how biotic and abiotic mechanisms interact to structure freshwater metacommunities. We explored using Hierarchical Modelling of Species Communities whether consistent species-to-species associations remain after accounting for species’ different responses to environmental and spatial variation in lake macrophyte communities across seven regions. We found that environmental filtering, a concept suggesting that the abiotic environment selects species with similar trait values within communities, was the primary mechanism structuring these metacommunities. Variance explained by environmental features varied from one region to another, showing context dependency. Species functional traits explained a relatively modest proportion of the total variation in species occurrences and species niches; however, environmental features had a statistically significant contribution to individual species traits. Phylogenetic signals were generally weak, and species-to-species associations showed context dependency across study regions. Alien-invasive species showed mostly negative associations with native species, whereas positive relationships between alien-invasive species were also evidenced. Moreover, we did not find any relationship between certain known alien-invasive and native species. Overall, metacommunity research in freshwater ecosystems should more resolutely integrate potential biotic interactions to future investigations to comprehensively understand the interplay between environmental factors, dispersal and biotic interactions in shaping freshwater community dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrobiologia
Published
2025-04-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-025-05866-6
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The signature of biotic interactions on lake macrophytes differs among seven metacommunities of three continents

Camino Fernández‐Aláez, Seppo Hellsten, B. Lukács, Laura Sass et al.
4 citations
Hydrobiologia
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
3.44
article

The signature of biotic interactions on lake macrophytes differs among seven metacommunities of three continents

Camino Fernández‐Aláez, Seppo Hellsten, B. Lukács, Laura Sass, Janne Alahuhta, Lars Baastrup‐Spohr, Jorge García‐Girón, Mary de Winton
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract There is a lack of empirical evidence on how biotic and abiotic mechanisms interact to structure freshwater metacommunities. We explored using Hierarchical Modelling of Species Communities whether consistent species-to-species associations remain after accounting for species’ different responses to environmental and spatial variation in lake macrophyte communities across seven regions. We found that environmental filtering, a concept suggesting that the abiotic environment selects species with similar trait values within communities, was the primary mechanism structuring these metacommunities. Variance explained by environmental features varied from one region to another, showing context dependency. Species functional traits explained a relatively modest proportion of the total variation in species occurrences and species niches; however, environmental features had a statistically significant contribution to individual species traits. Phylogenetic signals were generally weak, and species-to-species associations showed context dependency across study regions. Alien-invasive species showed mostly negative associations with native species, whereas positive relationships between alien-invasive species were also evidenced. Moreover, we did not find any relationship between certain known alien-invasive and native species. Overall, metacommunity research in freshwater ecosystems should more resolutely integrate potential biotic interactions to future investigations to comprehensively understand the interplay between environmental factors, dispersal and biotic interactions in shaping freshwater community dynamics.

HydrobiologiaVol. 852(17)
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Finnish Environment Institute (FI), University College Copenhagen (DK), HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research (HU), National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NZ), IT University of Copenhagen (DK), Universidad de León (ES), University of Oulu (FI)
Oulun Yliopisto, Agencia de Innovación y Desarrollo de Andalucía, Kvantum-instituutti, Oulun Yliopisto
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.