Why Are Plume Excess Temperatures Much Less Than the Temperature Drop Across the Lowermost‐Mantle Thermal Boundary Layer?

Abstract While temperature drop across the mantle's basal thermal boundary layer (TBL) is likely 1,000 K, the temperature anomaly of plumes believed to rise from that TBL is only up to a few hundred Kelvins. Reasons for that discrepancy are still poorly understood and a number of causes have been proposed. Here, we use the ASPECT software to model plumes from the lowermost mantle and study their excess temperatures. We use a mantle viscosity that depends on temperature and depth with a strong viscosity increase from below the lithosphere toward the lower mantle, reaching about Pas above the basal TBL, consistent with geoid modeling and slow motion of mantle plumes. With a mineral physics‐derived pyrolite material model, the difference between a plume adiabat and an ambient mantle adiabat just below the lithosphere is about two thirds of that at the base of the mantle, for example, 1,280 versus 835 K. 3D models of isolated plumes become nearly steady‐state 10–20 Myr after the plume head has reached the surface, with excess temperature drop compared to an adiabat for material directly from the core‐mantle boundary (CMB) usually less than 100 K. In the Earth, plumes are likely triggered by slabs and probably rise preferably above the margins of chemically distinct piles. This could lead to reduced excess temperatures, if plumes are more sheet‐like, similar to 2D models, or temperature at their source depth is less than at the CMB. Excess temperatures are further reduced when averaged over the plume conduit or melting region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jb030111
Citations
7
Primary Topic
High-pressure geophysics and materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Are Plume Excess Temperatures Much Less Than the Temperature Drop Across the Lowermost‐Mantle Thermal Boundary Layer?

Michaël Pons, Poulami Roy, Bernhard Steinberger, Matteo Paul Jopke
7 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
High-pressure geophysics and materials
13.06
article

Why Are Plume Excess Temperatures Much Less Than the Temperature Drop Across the Lowermost‐Mantle Thermal Boundary Layer?

Michaël Pons, Poulami Roy, Bernhard Steinberger, Matteo Paul Jopke
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract While temperature drop across the mantle's basal thermal boundary layer (TBL) is likely 1,000 K, the temperature anomaly of plumes believed to rise from that TBL is only up to a few hundred Kelvins. Reasons for that discrepancy are still poorly understood and a number of causes have been proposed. Here, we use the ASPECT software to model plumes from the lowermost mantle and study their excess temperatures. We use a mantle viscosity that depends on temperature and depth with a strong viscosity increase from below the lithosphere toward the lower mantle, reaching about Pas above the basal TBL, consistent with geoid modeling and slow motion of mantle plumes. With a mineral physics‐derived pyrolite material model, the difference between a plume adiabat and an ambient mantle adiabat just below the lithosphere is about two thirds of that at the base of the mantle, for example, 1,280 versus 835 K. 3D models of isolated plumes become nearly steady‐state 10–20 Myr after the plume head has reached the surface, with excess temperature drop compared to an adiabat for material directly from the core‐mantle boundary (CMB) usually less than 100 K. In the Earth, plumes are likely triggered by slabs and probably rise preferably above the margins of chemically distinct piles. This could lead to reduced excess temperatures, if plumes are more sheet‐like, similar to 2D models, or temperature at their source depth is less than at the CMB. Excess temperatures are further reduced when averaged over the plume conduit or melting region.

Journal of Geophysical Research Solid EarthVol. 130(4)
University of Potsdam (DE), GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE)
Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, Helmholtz Association
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
High-pressure geophysics and materials
13.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.