A Gap in Reporting: Student Demographic Information in Academic Universal Screening Studies

ABSTRACT Universal screening is an essential practice in any multi‐tiered system of support, but without understanding the demographic makeup of students in studies that inform current practices, the effectiveness in which instruments and screening approaches work best for students of demographically diverse backgrounds cannot be assessed. In this systematic review of eight major school psychology journals from 2001 to early 2024, 39 academic universal screening studies were identified. We summarized the reporting practices of the demographic makeup of samples and the types of measures used. When compared to national averages, Black students and students receiving free or reduced‐price lunch were underrepresented, while White students were overrepresented. Only six studies fully disaggregated results by racial and ethnic categories. Study results underscore the need for improved data reporting practices across school psychology journals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology in the Schools
Published
2025-04-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.23501
Primary Topic
Disability Education and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Gap in Reporting: Student Demographic Information in Academic Universal Screening Studies

Emily R. Forcht, Ethan R. Van Norman, Adelle K. Sturgell
Psychology in the Schools
Disability Education and Employment
article

A Gap in Reporting: Student Demographic Information in Academic Universal Screening Studies

Emily R. Forcht, Ethan R. Van Norman, Adelle K. Sturgell
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Universal screening is an essential practice in any multi‐tiered system of support, but without understanding the demographic makeup of students in studies that inform current practices, the effectiveness in which instruments and screening approaches work best for students of demographically diverse backgrounds cannot be assessed. In this systematic review of eight major school psychology journals from 2001 to early 2024, 39 academic universal screening studies were identified. We summarized the reporting practices of the demographic makeup of samples and the types of measures used. When compared to national averages, Black students and students receiving free or reduced‐price lunch were underrepresented, while White students were overrepresented. Only six studies fully disaggregated results by racial and ethnic categories. Study results underscore the need for improved data reporting practices across school psychology journals.

Psychology in the Schools
Lehigh University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Disability Education and Employment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.