Estimates of the Global Clear‐Sky Longwave Radiative Feedback Strength From Reanalysis Data

Abstract We use atmospheric profiles from ERA5, JRA55, and MERRA2 between 1993 and 2023 to estimate Earth's global clear‐sky longwave feedback strength on the seasonal and interannual timescale. Differences in the relationship of relative humidity with skin temperature prior to 2008 lead to interannual feedback strengths between 1.34 Wm −2 K −1 (JRA55) and 1.89 Wm −2 K −1 (MERRA2). Restricting the analysis to the last 16 years yields more consistent interannual estimates of 2.05 Wm −2 K −1 on average, which is larger than the overall seasonal estimate of 1.91 Wm −2 K −1 . The mid‐tropospheric drying causing this difference suggests a substantial influence of ENSO variability on the interannual timescale. This indicates a long‐term feedback strength smaller than 2.0 Wm −2 K −1 , which is already at the lower end of previous estimates; emphasizing the importance of accurate long‐term RH measurements to reliably project Earth's clear‐sky feedback strength.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2025-04-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024gl113495
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimates of the Global Clear‐Sky Longwave Radiative Feedback Strength From Reanalysis Data

Lukas Kluft, Björn Stevens, Hauke Schmidt, Helene M. Gloeckner
2 citations
Geophysical Research Letters
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
2.21
article

Estimates of the Global Clear‐Sky Longwave Radiative Feedback Strength From Reanalysis Data

Lukas Kluft, Björn Stevens, Hauke Schmidt, Helene M. Gloeckner
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract We use atmospheric profiles from ERA5, JRA55, and MERRA2 between 1993 and 2023 to estimate Earth's global clear‐sky longwave feedback strength on the seasonal and interannual timescale. Differences in the relationship of relative humidity with skin temperature prior to 2008 lead to interannual feedback strengths between 1.34 Wm −2 K −1 (JRA55) and 1.89 Wm −2 K −1 (MERRA2). Restricting the analysis to the last 16 years yields more consistent interannual estimates of 2.05 Wm −2 K −1 on average, which is larger than the overall seasonal estimate of 1.91 Wm −2 K −1 . The mid‐tropospheric drying causing this difference suggests a substantial influence of ENSO variability on the interannual timescale. This indicates a long‐term feedback strength smaller than 2.0 Wm −2 K −1 , which is already at the lower end of previous estimates; emphasizing the importance of accurate long‐term RH measurements to reliably project Earth's clear‐sky feedback strength.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 52(7)
Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law (DE), Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.