Can We Measure and Analyze Structural Racism in the Study of Health?

ABSTRACT In this paper, we critique the concept of structural racism as a determinant of health, as it is operationalized in quantitative research. Our review is not a defense of the concept but a critical examination. From this review, we share several different areas for methodological innovations, including identifying macro‐micro‐macro linkages, and measuring the absence of structural racism, versus assuming it is uniformly present in all social environments. Our review finds that the literature on structural racism is, for the most part, “walking backwards into the future,” rebranding established methods and measures with an innovative term of art, without creating new research designs, measures, methods and analyses. Therefore, we offer the following overarching criticism: researchers have not yet built a study of structural racism around methods that disclose this phenomenon in ways we did not previously understand. We posit that unless researchers can provide clearer and more innovative operationalizations of this concept, it and measurement of the phenomena, is likely to fade into obscurity as academic trends shift.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociology Compass
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.70054
Primary Topic
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can We Measure and Analyze Structural Racism in the Study of Health?

Von Welch, James Iveniuk, Chris Milner, Ashani Johnson‐Turbes
Sociology Compass
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
article

Can We Measure and Analyze Structural Racism in the Study of Health?

Von Welch, James Iveniuk, Chris Milner, Ashani Johnson‐Turbes
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this paper, we critique the concept of structural racism as a determinant of health, as it is operationalized in quantitative research. Our review is not a defense of the concept but a critical examination. From this review, we share several different areas for methodological innovations, including identifying macro‐micro‐macro linkages, and measuring the absence of structural racism, versus assuming it is uniformly present in all social environments. Our review finds that the literature on structural racism is, for the most part, “walking backwards into the future,” rebranding established methods and measures with an innovative term of art, without creating new research designs, measures, methods and analyses. Therefore, we offer the following overarching criticism: researchers have not yet built a study of structural racism around methods that disclose this phenomenon in ways we did not previously understand. We posit that unless researchers can provide clearer and more innovative operationalizations of this concept, it and measurement of the phenomena, is likely to fade into obscurity as academic trends shift.

Sociology CompassVol. 19(4)
University of Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.