Εvaluating Carbon Emissions of Hybrid Manufacturing Process: A Case Study on Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing

All environmental issues, and particularly climate change, have irreversible environmental, social, and financial impacts. Significantly reducing carbon emissions by 2030, as the highest contributor to climate change, is a vital for EU as expressed in the European Green Deal. In this direction, sustainable manufacturing intends to reduce negative impacts by minimizing energy consumption, lowering carbon emissions, and optimizing resource efficiency. Hybrid Manufacturing (HM), combining additive (AM) and subtractive manufacturing (SM) processes, is a very promising process in sustainable manufacturing, in addition of being a novel approach. The aim of this paper is to identify the carbon intensive parts of a HM cell, perform carbon footprint calculations through mathematical modelling and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and classify them as either energy or material related carbon emissions. This methodology is implemented in an HM including Direct Energy Deposition (DED) and CNC milling, successively alternating between the two to complete the part. Results indicate that at machine tool level, the material related emissions (4.64 kg CO 2 -eq), slightly dominate over the energy related emissions (4.51 kg CO 2 -eq). Powder consumption is almost solely responsible for material related emissions. Among energy related emissions, the AM cell’s chiller was the largest contributor (accounting for 28.3% of the total emissions), followed by the AM head motion system (10.9%), and laser machine (9.6%), while the subtractive process emitting considerably less in this case. Future work will aim to optimize process parameters to reduce HM emissions while ensuring high product quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia CIRP
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2025.02.045
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Εvaluating Carbon Emissions of Hybrid Manufacturing Process: A Case Study on Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing

Vasiliki C. Panagiotopoulou, Panagiotis G. Stavropoulos, Evangelia Xydea
Procedia CIRP
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

Εvaluating Carbon Emissions of Hybrid Manufacturing Process: A Case Study on Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing

Vasiliki C. Panagiotopoulou, Panagiotis G. Stavropoulos, Evangelia Xydea
article en

Abstract

All environmental issues, and particularly climate change, have irreversible environmental, social, and financial impacts. Significantly reducing carbon emissions by 2030, as the highest contributor to climate change, is a vital for EU as expressed in the European Green Deal. In this direction, sustainable manufacturing intends to reduce negative impacts by minimizing energy consumption, lowering carbon emissions, and optimizing resource efficiency. Hybrid Manufacturing (HM), combining additive (AM) and subtractive manufacturing (SM) processes, is a very promising process in sustainable manufacturing, in addition of being a novel approach. The aim of this paper is to identify the carbon intensive parts of a HM cell, perform carbon footprint calculations through mathematical modelling and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and classify them as either energy or material related carbon emissions. This methodology is implemented in an HM including Direct Energy Deposition (DED) and CNC milling, successively alternating between the two to complete the part. Results indicate that at machine tool level, the material related emissions (4.64 kg CO 2 -eq), slightly dominate over the energy related emissions (4.51 kg CO 2 -eq). Powder consumption is almost solely responsible for material related emissions. Among energy related emissions, the AM cell’s chiller was the largest contributor (accounting for 28.3% of the total emissions), followed by the AM head motion system (10.9%), and laser machine (9.6%), while the subtractive process emitting considerably less in this case. Future work will aim to optimize process parameters to reduce HM emissions while ensuring high product quality.

Procedia CIRPVol. 133
University of Patras (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Εvaluating Carbon Emissions of Hybrid Manufacturing Process: A Case Study on Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing — Vasiliki C. Panagiotopoulou, Panagiotis G. Stavropoulos, et al. · Procedia CIRP (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS