Guidelines for improved quantification and reporting of carbon stocks and additional carbon storage in agroforestry systems

Abstract The number of scientific publications related to biomass carbon or soil organic carbon under various land management practices has globally and dramatically increased during the last two decades, the same applies to the peer reviewed Agroforestry Systems journal. However, the quality of papers on carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems is very heterogeneous, and many studies do not fulfil simple requirements that would ensure the scientific value of these studies, resulting in high rates of rejections before and after review. The aim of this paper, co-authored by the Editor-in-Chief and Associate Editors of the Agroforestry Systems journal is to provide some basic guidelines to improve the quantification and reporting of carbon stocks and additional carbon storage in agroforestry systems, and to maximize manuscript acceptance. These guidelines are also of use for any other international peer-reviewed journal publishing studies on this topic. We also provide a checklist, for both authors and reviewers, of compulsory and recommended variables to be included before submission of an original study related to soil and/or biomass carbon stocks and sequestration in agroforestry systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agroforestry Systems
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-025-01184-x
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Bioenergy crop production and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guidelines for improved quantification and reporting of carbon stocks and additional carbon storage in agroforestry systems

Bohdan Lojka, Rémi Cardinael, Georg Cadisch, Christian Dupraz et al.
10 citations
Agroforestry Systems
Bioenergy crop production and management
19.03
article

Guidelines for improved quantification and reporting of carbon stocks and additional carbon storage in agroforestry systems

Bohdan Lojka, Rémi Cardinael, Georg Cadisch, Christian Dupraz, Maren Oelbermann
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Abstract The number of scientific publications related to biomass carbon or soil organic carbon under various land management practices has globally and dramatically increased during the last two decades, the same applies to the peer reviewed Agroforestry Systems journal. However, the quality of papers on carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems is very heterogeneous, and many studies do not fulfil simple requirements that would ensure the scientific value of these studies, resulting in high rates of rejections before and after review. The aim of this paper, co-authored by the Editor-in-Chief and Associate Editors of the Agroforestry Systems journal is to provide some basic guidelines to improve the quantification and reporting of carbon stocks and additional carbon storage in agroforestry systems, and to maximize manuscript acceptance. These guidelines are also of use for any other international peer-reviewed journal publishing studies on this topic. We also provide a checklist, for both authors and reviewers, of compulsory and recommended variables to be included before submission of an original study related to soil and/or biomass carbon stocks and sequestration in agroforestry systems.

Agroforestry SystemsVol. 99(4)
University of Hohenheim (DE), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), University of Waterloo (CA), University of Zimbabwe (ZW), Université de Montpellier (FR), Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZ), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Institut Agro Montpelier (FR)
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Bioenergy crop production and management
19.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.