Over a decade later: the role and place of outdoor education in the Australian national curriculum

Abstract Outdoor Education has maintained a dynamic yet peripheral role within the Australian Curriculum over the past decade. Building on the foundational work of Gray and Martin (2012), the evolving status of Outdoor Education is critically examined, particularly considering the rollout of Version 9 of the Australian Curriculum. Historical context, curriculum reviews, and scholarly literature are synthesised to analyse its integration into existing subject areas and assess its viability as a standalone discipline. Nomenclature of the field is explored and explained, particularly delineating Outdoor Education research from the practical application of Outdoor Learning in the curriculum. Despite widespread recognition and advocacy of the benefits of Outdoor Education, it remains marginalised within curriculum policy, primarily confined to the Health and Physical Education learning area. Critical questions originally posed by Gray and Martin are revisited. The overarching question of ‘Should Outdoor Education be a part of every Australian child’s educational experience?’ is answered overwhelmingly—yes!

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education
Published
2025-04-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-025-00209-4
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Outdoor and Experiential Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Over a decade later: the role and place of outdoor education in the Australian national curriculum

Thomas M. McKenna
3 citations
Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education
Outdoor and Experiential Education
7.32
article

Over a decade later: the role and place of outdoor education in the Australian national curriculum

Thomas M. McKenna
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Outdoor Education has maintained a dynamic yet peripheral role within the Australian Curriculum over the past decade. Building on the foundational work of Gray and Martin (2012), the evolving status of Outdoor Education is critically examined, particularly considering the rollout of Version 9 of the Australian Curriculum. Historical context, curriculum reviews, and scholarly literature are synthesised to analyse its integration into existing subject areas and assess its viability as a standalone discipline. Nomenclature of the field is explored and explained, particularly delineating Outdoor Education research from the practical application of Outdoor Learning in the curriculum. Despite widespread recognition and advocacy of the benefits of Outdoor Education, it remains marginalised within curriculum policy, primarily confined to the Health and Physical Education learning area. Critical questions originally posed by Gray and Martin are revisited. The overarching question of ‘Should Outdoor Education be a part of every Australian child’s educational experience?’ is answered overwhelmingly—yes!

Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education
The University of Queensland (AU)
University of Queensland
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Outdoor and Experiential Education
7.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.