Sola tweetura: Digital Fundamentalism and the Virtual Scriptures

Abstract Many dangers of social media are typically framed with images and concepts assuming or employing the paradigm of addiction. The addiction paradigm is valuable descriptively, as a means towards understanding various phenomena of social media, and rhetorically, with regard to public policy. But, the paradigm is limited, and risks reducing the problems of social media to questions of physiology and (brute) animal behavior. This paper focuses on the need to develop distinctively human paradigms for understanding the risks of social media. Fundamentalism is offered as one such uniquely human paradigm. Fundamentalism, abstracted from any specific religion, is proposed as a pathology of reasoning, and specifically of reading. Similarities between fundamentalists and users of social media are articulated, and then an analysis of the form of social media—distinct from their content—is conducted so as to draw out how the form of social media encourages poor habits or pathologies of literacy. Social media are revealed to be less about their content and more about reactions to content, and an argument is made that the kinds of reactions favored by social media erode mature reasoning or rationality in users of the media.