Does Religiosity Reduce Mortality Risk Over the Second Half of Life Among Southern Californians? A Multidimensional Model Within a Hazard Modeling Framework

This study explored the relationship between a multidimensional typology of religiosity and risk of mortality. Using data from middle-aged Southern California respondents in the Longitudinal Study of Generations, we performed latent class analysis to construct a typology of religiosity, which was then used to predict mortality from 1971 to 2020. We identified four religiosity classes: strongly, weakly, privately, and liberally religious. Cox proportional hazard models revealed that privately religious males had greater mortality risk than strongly religious males, even after controlling for the mediators self-rated health and psychological wellbeing. In women, risk of mortality was explained by these mediators rather than by religiosity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Religion and Health
Published
2025-04-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-025-02297-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Religiosity Reduce Mortality Risk Over the Second Half of Life Among Southern Californians? A Multidimensional Model Within a Hazard Modeling Framework

Woosang Hwang, María Brown, Merril D. Silverstein, Wencheng Zhang
1 citations
Journal of Religion and Health
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
2.17
article

Does Religiosity Reduce Mortality Risk Over the Second Half of Life Among Southern Californians? A Multidimensional Model Within a Hazard Modeling Framework

Woosang Hwang, María Brown, Merril D. Silverstein, Wencheng Zhang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study explored the relationship between a multidimensional typology of religiosity and risk of mortality. Using data from middle-aged Southern California respondents in the Longitudinal Study of Generations, we performed latent class analysis to construct a typology of religiosity, which was then used to predict mortality from 1971 to 2020. We identified four religiosity classes: strongly, weakly, privately, and liberally religious. Cox proportional hazard models revealed that privately religious males had greater mortality risk than strongly religious males, even after controlling for the mediators self-rated health and psychological wellbeing. In women, risk of mortality was explained by these mediators rather than by religiosity.

Journal of Religion and HealthVol. 64(6)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Sookmyung Women's University (KR), Syracuse University (US)
John Templeton Foundation, National Institute on Aging
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
2.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Does Religiosity Reduce Mortality Risk Over the Second Half of Life Among Southern Californians? A Multidimensional Model Within a Hazard Modeling Framework — Woosang Hwang, María Brown, et al. · Journal of Religion and Health (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS