Transmissions, Decisions, Discourses – A Methodological Framework for Measuring and Comparing Democratic Innovations’ Policy‐Impact(s)

Abstract Democratic innovations are increasingly used to counteract crisis phenomena such as citizen disengagement or disaffection. But to offer a cure, democratic innovations must be embedded within the democratic system; there must be a healthy “flow in communication” (henceforth: transmissions) between different democratic spaces. Yet so far there is no comprehensive conceptual‐methodological framework that allows for systematically assessing transmissions and the different ways in which democratic innovations impact democratic processes in empowered spaces. Our article fills this gap: it suggests a flexible three‐step‐procedure enabling researchers to assess transmissions of “demands”, “discursive elements” and discourses with distinct research designs and methods. We demonstrate the merits of this approach with the help of two illustrative analyses. We show that our integrated framework can be an apt tool for more systematic comparative analyses of diverse institutional designs and their “embeddedness” in contemporary complex democratic systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Swiss Political Science Review
Published
2025-04-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12657
Primary Topic
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transmissions, Decisions, Discourses – A Methodological Framework for Measuring and Comparing Democratic Innovations’ Policy‐Impact(s)

Dannica Fleuß, Christoph Deppe
Swiss Political Science Review
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
article

Transmissions, Decisions, Discourses – A Methodological Framework for Measuring and Comparing Democratic Innovations’ Policy‐Impact(s)

Dannica Fleuß, Christoph Deppe
article en

Abstract

Abstract Democratic innovations are increasingly used to counteract crisis phenomena such as citizen disengagement or disaffection. But to offer a cure, democratic innovations must be embedded within the democratic system; there must be a healthy “flow in communication” (henceforth: transmissions) between different democratic spaces. Yet so far there is no comprehensive conceptual‐methodological framework that allows for systematically assessing transmissions and the different ways in which democratic innovations impact democratic processes in empowered spaces. Our article fills this gap: it suggests a flexible three‐step‐procedure enabling researchers to assess transmissions of “demands”, “discursive elements” and discourses with distinct research designs and methods. We demonstrate the merits of this approach with the help of two illustrative analyses. We show that our integrated framework can be an apt tool for more systematic comparative analyses of diverse institutional designs and their “embeddedness” in contemporary complex democratic systems.

Swiss Political Science ReviewVol. 31(4)
University of Nairobi (KE), Helmut Schmidt University (DE), Heidelberg University (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Transmissions, Decisions, Discourses – A Methodological Framework for Measuring and Comparing Democratic Innovations’ Policy‐Impact(s) — Dannica Fleuß, Christoph Deppe · Swiss Political Science Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS