High microplastic pollution in birds of urban waterbodies revealed by non-invasively collected faecal samples

Plastic waste concentrates in aquatic environments, where wildlife can ingest or absorb it. In birds, plastic particles have been identified in hundreds of aquatic and terrestrial species leading to adverse effects. Most studies investigating microplastic pollution in birds use dead individuals or invasive techniques. However, microplastic ingestion can also be determined by analysing birds' faeces. There is a lack of information regarding microplastic pollution of birds inhabiting urban freshwaters, where very high pollution levels are expected. We analysed body condition of individual birds inhabiting freshwaters in the city of Münster (Germany) and microplastic contamination in their faeces. We found microplastic particles (mainly fibres) in all species (Mallard Anas platyrhynchos, Jack Snipe Lymnocryptes minimus, Black-headed Gull Chroicocephalus ridibundus and Common Moorhen Gallinula chloropus) and most samples (98 %). Microplastic pollution ranged from 0.26 to 72.03 particles per mg faeces. The observed microplastic pollution frequency and pollution levels were much higher compared to other studies of birds in freshwater environments, probably resulting from the high contamination of urban waters. We found no effect of the number of microplastic particles on body condition. As all investigated species are at least partially migratory, a long-distance transport of microplastic particles may increase the probability that migratory birds transport (and excrete) microplastic particles to remote locations that otherwise suffer from little anthropogenic pollution. We demonstrate that non-invasively collected faecal samples collected during bird ringing/banding can be used as indicators of microplastic pollution, and call for more studies investigating the effects of microplastics on birds - with a special focus on urban freshwaters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Science of The Total Environment
Published
2025-04-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179306
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High microplastic pollution in birds of urban waterbodies revealed by non-invasively collected faecal samples

Friederike Gabel, Diana Michler‐Kozma, Wieland Heim, Ramona Julia Heim et al.
9 citations
The Science of The Total Environment
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
4.53
article

High microplastic pollution in birds of urban waterbodies revealed by non-invasively collected faecal samples

Friederike Gabel, Diana Michler‐Kozma, Wieland Heim, Ramona Julia Heim, Moritz Meinken, Clara Holtmannspötter, Nick Niemann, Laurin Temme
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Plastic waste concentrates in aquatic environments, where wildlife can ingest or absorb it. In birds, plastic particles have been identified in hundreds of aquatic and terrestrial species leading to adverse effects. Most studies investigating microplastic pollution in birds use dead individuals or invasive techniques. However, microplastic ingestion can also be determined by analysing birds' faeces. There is a lack of information regarding microplastic pollution of birds inhabiting urban freshwaters, where very high pollution levels are expected. We analysed body condition of individual birds inhabiting freshwaters in the city of Münster (Germany) and microplastic contamination in their faeces. We found microplastic particles (mainly fibres) in all species (Mallard Anas platyrhynchos, Jack Snipe Lymnocryptes minimus, Black-headed Gull Chroicocephalus ridibundus and Common Moorhen Gallinula chloropus) and most samples (98 %). Microplastic pollution ranged from 0.26 to 72.03 particles per mg faeces. The observed microplastic pollution frequency and pollution levels were much higher compared to other studies of birds in freshwater environments, probably resulting from the high contamination of urban waters. We found no effect of the number of microplastic particles on body condition. As all investigated species are at least partially migratory, a long-distance transport of microplastic particles may increase the probability that migratory birds transport (and excrete) microplastic particles to remote locations that otherwise suffer from little anthropogenic pollution. We demonstrate that non-invasively collected faecal samples collected during bird ringing/banding can be used as indicators of microplastic pollution, and call for more studies investigating the effects of microplastics on birds - with a special focus on urban freshwaters.

The Science of The Total EnvironmentVol. 975
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE), University of Münster (DE), Overseas Museum (DE), University of Applied Sciences for Public Administration and Management (DE)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
4.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.