Theory for the ambiguity function method: probability model and global solution

Abstract In this contribution, we introduce some new theory for the classical GNSS ambiguity function (AF) method. We provide the probability model by means of which the AF-estimator becomes a maximum likelihood estimator, and we provide a globally convergent algorithm for computing the AF-estimate. The algorithm is constructed from combining the branch-and-bound principle, with a special convex relaxation of the multimodal ambiguity function, to which the projected-gradient-descent method is applied to obtain the required bounds. We also provide a systematic comparison between the AF-principle and that of integer least-squares (ILS). From this comparison, the conclusion is reached that the two principles are fundamentally different, although there are identified circumstances under which one can expect AF- and ILS-solutions to behave similarly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geodesy
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-025-01945-7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
GNSS positioning and interference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Theory for the ambiguity function method: probability model and global solution

Lotfi Massarweh, Peter J. G. Teunissen
1 citations
Journal of Geodesy
GNSS positioning and interference
4.99
article

Theory for the ambiguity function method: probability model and global solution

Lotfi Massarweh, Peter J. G. Teunissen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this contribution, we introduce some new theory for the classical GNSS ambiguity function (AF) method. We provide the probability model by means of which the AF-estimator becomes a maximum likelihood estimator, and we provide a globally convergent algorithm for computing the AF-estimate. The algorithm is constructed from combining the branch-and-bound principle, with a special convex relaxation of the multimodal ambiguity function, to which the projected-gradient-descent method is applied to obtain the required bounds. We also provide a systematic comparison between the AF-principle and that of integer least-squares (ILS). From this comparison, the conclusion is reached that the two principles are fundamentally different, although there are identified circumstances under which one can expect AF- and ILS-solutions to behave similarly.

Journal of GeodesyVol. 99(4)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Curtin University (AU), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
GNSS positioning and interference
4.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Theory for the ambiguity function method: probability model and global solution — Lotfi Massarweh, Peter J. G. Teunissen · Journal of Geodesy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS