Beyond the Lab—Proposing an Indigenous Psychologies Research Paradigm

ABSTRACT To align with the goal of this section, we propose an ontological turn to the psychology research paradigm that extends beyond mainstream methodology. Drawing on the existing literature of indigenous psychology (IP) and two qualitative studies from Singapore and Malaysia, we critically examine the differences of epistemology and methodology between mainstream approaches in Western psychology and the IP approach to the culturally different other. Next, we extract the research methods adopted by scientific inquiries of dang‐ki healing within certain Chinese communities and experiences of suffering within the Temiar tribal group. These methods include establishing the reciprocal relationship and fluid boundary between the investigators (observers) and investigated (observed), conducting qualitative research in a natural setting with cognitive flexibility, using fieldtrip immersion to gain insiders' worldviews and feedback on the findings. Finally, we offer a few action guidelines for future researchers conducting indigenous psychological research in the communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social and Personality Psychology Compass
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.70053
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the Lab—Proposing an Indigenous Psychologies Research Paradigm

Boon‐Ooi Lee, Justine Jian‐Ai Thong, Rachel Sing‐Kiat Ting
1 citations
Social and Personality Psychology Compass
Cultural Differences and Values
2.44
article

Beyond the Lab—Proposing an Indigenous Psychologies Research Paradigm

Boon‐Ooi Lee, Justine Jian‐Ai Thong, Rachel Sing‐Kiat Ting
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT To align with the goal of this section, we propose an ontological turn to the psychology research paradigm that extends beyond mainstream methodology. Drawing on the existing literature of indigenous psychology (IP) and two qualitative studies from Singapore and Malaysia, we critically examine the differences of epistemology and methodology between mainstream approaches in Western psychology and the IP approach to the culturally different other. Next, we extract the research methods adopted by scientific inquiries of dang‐ki healing within certain Chinese communities and experiences of suffering within the Temiar tribal group. These methods include establishing the reciprocal relationship and fluid boundary between the investigators (observers) and investigated (observed), conducting qualitative research in a natural setting with cognitive flexibility, using fieldtrip immersion to gain insiders' worldviews and feedback on the findings. Finally, we offer a few action guidelines for future researchers conducting indigenous psychological research in the communities.

Social and Personality Psychology CompassVol. 19(4)
Monash University Malaysia (MY), Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Monash University
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Cultural Differences and Values
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.