Sex-specific aspects in a population of patients undergoing evaluation for interstitial lung disease with transbronchial cryobiopsy

There are well-documented differences in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) between sexes. The sex-specific prevalence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) subtypes in patients who require a full diagnostic work-up, including transbronchial cryobiopsy (TCB), after initial multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) is still unknown. Retrospective analysis of sex dispareties in patients with ILD who received an interdisciplinary indication for lung biopsy and underwent bronchoalveolar lavage, TCB and, if necessary, surgical lung biopsy at our ILD centre in Heidelberg between 11/17 and 12/21. The analysis included clinical parameters, visual assessment of computed tomography (CT), automated histogram analyses of lung density by validated software and final MDD-ILD classifications. A total of 402 patients (248 men, 154 women; mean age 68 ± 12 years) were analysed. Smoking behaviour was similar between the sexes, but women were more exposed to environmental factors, whereas men were more exposed to occupational factors. Women had higher rates of thyroid disease (29.9% vs. 12.5%; p < 0.001) and extrathoracic malignancies (16.2% vs. 9.3%; p = 0.041), but lower rates of coronary heart disease (7.1% vs. 19.8%; p < 0.001), stroke (1.3% vs. 6.5%; p = 0.014) and sleep apnoea (5.8% vs. 17.7%; p < 0.001). There were no sex differences regarding CT lung density. On visual inspection, women were less likely to have reticular opacities (65% vs. 76%; p = 0.017) and features of usual interstitial pneumonia (17% vs. 34%; p < 0.001). Among final diagnoses, hypersensitivity pneumonitis was more common in women (34.4%) compared to men (21.8%; p = 0.007). In contrast, IPF was more common in men (22.6%) than in women (7.1%; p < 0.001), and unclassifiable interstitial lung disease was also more frequent in men (21.8%) compared to women (6.5%; p < 0.001). This study highlights significant sex-based differences in the prevalence and characteristics of ILD requiring comprehensive diagnostic work-up. These findings underscore the importance of considering sex-specific factors in the diagnosis and management of ILD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-04-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94575-0
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex-specific aspects in a population of patients undergoing evaluation for interstitial lung disease with transbronchial cryobiopsy

Markus Polke, Katharina Buschulte, Mark Oliver Wielpütz, Felix Herth et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
1.52
article

Sex-specific aspects in a population of patients undergoing evaluation for interstitial lung disease with transbronchial cryobiopsy

Markus Polke, Katharina Buschulte, Mark Oliver Wielpütz, Felix Herth, Konstantina Kontogianni, Kathrin Kahnert, Claus Peter Heußel, Franziska Christina Trudzinski, Michael Allgäeuer, Monika Eichinger, Janna Reinhard, J Michels-Zetsche, Michael Kreuter, Laura Valentina Klotz, Ralf Eberhardt, Maximilian Güttlein
article en
1 citations

Abstract

There are well-documented differences in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) between sexes. The sex-specific prevalence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) subtypes in patients who require a full diagnostic work-up, including transbronchial cryobiopsy (TCB), after initial multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) is still unknown. Retrospective analysis of sex dispareties in patients with ILD who received an interdisciplinary indication for lung biopsy and underwent bronchoalveolar lavage, TCB and, if necessary, surgical lung biopsy at our ILD centre in Heidelberg between 11/17 and 12/21. The analysis included clinical parameters, visual assessment of computed tomography (CT), automated histogram analyses of lung density by validated software and final MDD-ILD classifications. A total of 402 patients (248 men, 154 women; mean age 68 ± 12 years) were analysed. Smoking behaviour was similar between the sexes, but women were more exposed to environmental factors, whereas men were more exposed to occupational factors. Women had higher rates of thyroid disease (29.9% vs. 12.5%; p < 0.001) and extrathoracic malignancies (16.2% vs. 9.3%; p = 0.041), but lower rates of coronary heart disease (7.1% vs. 19.8%; p < 0.001), stroke (1.3% vs. 6.5%; p = 0.014) and sleep apnoea (5.8% vs. 17.7%; p < 0.001). There were no sex differences regarding CT lung density. On visual inspection, women were less likely to have reticular opacities (65% vs. 76%; p = 0.017) and features of usual interstitial pneumonia (17% vs. 34%; p < 0.001). Among final diagnoses, hypersensitivity pneumonitis was more common in women (34.4%) compared to men (21.8%; p = 0.007). In contrast, IPF was more common in men (22.6%) than in women (7.1%; p < 0.001), and unclassifiable interstitial lung disease was also more frequent in men (21.8%) compared to women (6.5%; p < 0.001). This study highlights significant sex-based differences in the prevalence and characteristics of ILD requiring comprehensive diagnostic work-up. These findings underscore the importance of considering sex-specific factors in the diagnosis and management of ILD.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), German Center for Lung Research (DE), Asklepios Klinik Barmbek (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.