Could drivers be deemed impaired based on prior sleep duration? Community and stakeholder perspectives

• Persistent fatigue-related crashes highlight need for clear fatigue driving guidelines. • Study explores community and industry perspectives on driver fatigue regulation. • Most community and industry stakeholders support a minimum 5-hour sleep requirement for driving. • Strong endorsement for public education on fatigue and driving safety. • Findings suggest potential policy support for fatigue-related impairment legislation. Vehicle crashes caused by drink driving and speeding have decreased markedly in recent years due to enforcement strategies and specific guidance on ‘how drunk is too drunk’ and ‘how fast is too fast’. However, fatigue-related vehicle crashes have not declined, likely reflecting both a lack of clear guidance on ‘how tired is too tired’ to drive, and the lack of a relevant legislative framework. A two-phase qualitative study was undertaken with community members (focus groups; n = 33) and road transport industry stakeholders (interviews; n = 28). Participants were asked to (i) identify how much sleep they believe is required to drive safely, (ii) describe how they would respond to the introduction of regulations regarding ‘deemed impairment’ with respect to driver fatigue, and (iii) provide insight into how such legislation could be implemented. Most participants believed that it may be appropriate to require at least 5 h of sleep prior to driving and were supportive of fatigue-related deemed impairment legislation, but were concerned about how such legislation would operate in practice. Critically, all participants strongly supported the development of a public education campaign providing clear guidance on how to determine whether one is ‘safe to drive’ based on prior sleep (i.e., ‘how tired is too tired’). Based on these findings, there may be reasonable support for policy makers and ultimately politicians to progress legislation that deems drivers to be impaired based on prior sleep duration. Perhaps more critically, participants identified a clear need for a strong public education campaign.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Safety Science
Published
2025-04-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106868
Primary Topic
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Could drivers be deemed impaired based on prior sleep duration? Community and stakeholder perspectives

Madeline Sprajcer, Gregory D. Roach, Anastasi Kosmadopoulos, Drew Dawson∥ et al.
Safety Science
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
article

Could drivers be deemed impaired based on prior sleep duration? Community and stakeholder perspectives

Madeline Sprajcer, Gregory D. Roach, Anastasi Kosmadopoulos, Drew Dawson∥, Charli Sargent
article en

Abstract

• Persistent fatigue-related crashes highlight need for clear fatigue driving guidelines. • Study explores community and industry perspectives on driver fatigue regulation. • Most community and industry stakeholders support a minimum 5-hour sleep requirement for driving. • Strong endorsement for public education on fatigue and driving safety. • Findings suggest potential policy support for fatigue-related impairment legislation. Vehicle crashes caused by drink driving and speeding have decreased markedly in recent years due to enforcement strategies and specific guidance on ‘how drunk is too drunk’ and ‘how fast is too fast’. However, fatigue-related vehicle crashes have not declined, likely reflecting both a lack of clear guidance on ‘how tired is too tired’ to drive, and the lack of a relevant legislative framework. A two-phase qualitative study was undertaken with community members (focus groups; n = 33) and road transport industry stakeholders (interviews; n = 28). Participants were asked to (i) identify how much sleep they believe is required to drive safely, (ii) describe how they would respond to the introduction of regulations regarding ‘deemed impairment’ with respect to driver fatigue, and (iii) provide insight into how such legislation could be implemented. Most participants believed that it may be appropriate to require at least 5 h of sleep prior to driving and were supportive of fatigue-related deemed impairment legislation, but were concerned about how such legislation would operate in practice. Critically, all participants strongly supported the development of a public education campaign providing clear guidance on how to determine whether one is ‘safe to drive’ based on prior sleep (i.e., ‘how tired is too tired’). Based on these findings, there may be reasonable support for policy makers and ultimately politicians to progress legislation that deems drivers to be impaired based on prior sleep duration. Perhaps more critically, participants identified a clear need for a strong public education campaign.

Safety ScienceVol. 187
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.