Intraspecific diversity poorly predicts invasibility and invasiveness in communities: a meta‐analysis of experimental invasions

Identifying the biotic factors underlying invasion success into existing communities is critical to understand the dynamics of biological invasions; and while some studies suggest that intraspecific diversity may play an important role, there has not been a systematic evaluation of the evidence. We performed a meta‐analysis on 37 experimental studies and 109 effect sizes to test two hypotheses: 1) higher intraspecific diversity in a resident population decreases the likelihood of it being successfully invaded by other species, and 2) higher intraspecific diversity in an invading population increases its ability to invade another species or community. We found heterogeneous effects among studies and that overall resident genetic diversity has a very small, non‐significant negative effect on invasion success, while invader genetic diversity has a small, non‐significant positive effect. The minimal impact of intraspecific diversity is somewhat unexpected, given the well‐understood mechanisms analogous to those offered for interspecific diversity. These include sampling effects and complementarity, in which diversity is expected to maximize resource use and increase density, thereby reducing niche availability and subsequent invasibility. We recommend that future research focus on a wider diversity of organisms, include longer term experiments, and measure genetic dissimilarity to better understand the role of intraspecific diversity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oikos
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/oik.10977
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intraspecific diversity poorly predicts invasibility and invasiveness in communities: a meta‐analysis of experimental invasions

Taylor Zallek, Kelsey Lyberger, Isabel Delwel, Dylan Lee Loth
Oikos
Plant and animal studies
article

Intraspecific diversity poorly predicts invasibility and invasiveness in communities: a meta‐analysis of experimental invasions

Taylor Zallek, Kelsey Lyberger, Isabel Delwel, Dylan Lee Loth
article en

Abstract

Identifying the biotic factors underlying invasion success into existing communities is critical to understand the dynamics of biological invasions; and while some studies suggest that intraspecific diversity may play an important role, there has not been a systematic evaluation of the evidence. We performed a meta‐analysis on 37 experimental studies and 109 effect sizes to test two hypotheses: 1) higher intraspecific diversity in a resident population decreases the likelihood of it being successfully invaded by other species, and 2) higher intraspecific diversity in an invading population increases its ability to invade another species or community. We found heterogeneous effects among studies and that overall resident genetic diversity has a very small, non‐significant negative effect on invasion success, while invader genetic diversity has a small, non‐significant positive effect. The minimal impact of intraspecific diversity is somewhat unexpected, given the well‐understood mechanisms analogous to those offered for interspecific diversity. These include sampling effects and complementarity, in which diversity is expected to maximize resource use and increase density, thereby reducing niche availability and subsequent invasibility. We recommend that future research focus on a wider diversity of organisms, include longer term experiments, and measure genetic dissimilarity to better understand the role of intraspecific diversity.

OikosVol. 2025(7)
University of Pittsburgh (US), Arizona State University (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.