Seasonality modulates coral trophic plasticity in an extreme, multi‐stressor environment

Abstract Corals with high trophic plasticity, i.e., the ability to change the relative contribution of heterotrophic and autotrophic nutrition to their mixotrophic diet, can have increased tolerance to individual stressors, but it is poorly understood how trophic strategies shift in response to combined global (e.g., warming, acidification) and local stressors (e.g., nutrient input). Furthermore, it remains unclear how season‐associated changes in physicochemical conditions modulate trophic strategies and which coral species generally have trophic plasticity. We measured the tissue stable isotopes (δ 13 C and δ 15 N) of three coral species ( Siderastrea siderea , Siderastrea radians , and branching Porites sp.) from two distinct habitats: extreme, multi‐stressor inland bay habitats and nearby fringing reefs with more benign environmental conditions. We further captured trophic plasticity between dry and wet seasons, as well as the effects of in situ heat stress on trophic strategies. Bay corals tended to be more autotrophic than fringing reef corals, which may be driven by higher nutrient input in the bays. All three coral species shifted their trophic strategy between the cool dry and warm wet seasons; however, the direction of trophic shifts varied between δ 13 C and δ 15 N. Bay S. siderea had the highest trophic plasticity across seasons, which likely facilitates their success in these multi‐stressor habitats. Interestingly, not all species relied equally on heterotrophy, as bay Porites had a primarily autotrophic diet, even during the wet season when conditions were more extreme. This highlights that coral tolerance to more extreme conditions is promoted through dynamic shifts in diet, rather than only increasing heterotrophy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Limnology and Oceanography
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.70046
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seasonality modulates coral trophic plasticity in an extreme, multi‐stressor environment

Sarah L. Solomon, Jasper M. de Goeij, Verena Schoepf, Emily M. Croasdale
1 citations
Limnology and Oceanography
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
1.72
article

Seasonality modulates coral trophic plasticity in an extreme, multi‐stressor environment

Sarah L. Solomon, Jasper M. de Goeij, Verena Schoepf, Emily M. Croasdale
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Corals with high trophic plasticity, i.e., the ability to change the relative contribution of heterotrophic and autotrophic nutrition to their mixotrophic diet, can have increased tolerance to individual stressors, but it is poorly understood how trophic strategies shift in response to combined global (e.g., warming, acidification) and local stressors (e.g., nutrient input). Furthermore, it remains unclear how season‐associated changes in physicochemical conditions modulate trophic strategies and which coral species generally have trophic plasticity. We measured the tissue stable isotopes (δ 13 C and δ 15 N) of three coral species ( Siderastrea siderea , Siderastrea radians , and branching Porites sp.) from two distinct habitats: extreme, multi‐stressor inland bay habitats and nearby fringing reefs with more benign environmental conditions. We further captured trophic plasticity between dry and wet seasons, as well as the effects of in situ heat stress on trophic strategies. Bay corals tended to be more autotrophic than fringing reef corals, which may be driven by higher nutrient input in the bays. All three coral species shifted their trophic strategy between the cool dry and warm wet seasons; however, the direction of trophic shifts varied between δ 13 C and δ 15 N. Bay S. siderea had the highest trophic plasticity across seasons, which likely facilitates their success in these multi‐stressor habitats. Interestingly, not all species relied equally on heterotrophy, as bay Porites had a primarily autotrophic diet, even during the wet season when conditions were more extreme. This highlights that coral tolerance to more extreme conditions is promoted through dynamic shifts in diet, rather than only increasing heterotrophy.

Limnology and OceanographyVol. 70(5)
University of Lisbon (PT), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.