An open-access database of nature-based carbon offset project boundaries

Nature-based climate solutions (NBS) have become an important component of strategies aiming to reduce atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> and mitigate climate change impacts. Carbon offsets have emerged as one of the most widely implemented NBS strategies, however, these projects have also been criticized for exaggerating offsets. Verifying the efficacy of NBS-derived carbon offset is complicated by a lack of readily available geospatial boundary data. Herein, we detail methods and present a database of nature-based offset project boundaries. This database provides the locations of 575 NBS projects distributed across 55 countries. Geospatial boundaries were aggregated using a combination of scraping data from carbon project registries (n = 433, 75.3%) as well as manual georeferencing and digitization (n = 127, 22.1%). Database entries include three varieties of carbon projects: avoided deforestation, afforestation, reforestation and re-vegetation, and improved forest management. An accuracy assessment of the georeferencing and digitizing process indicated a high degree of accuracy (intersection over union score of 0.98 ± 0.015).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Data
Published
2025-04-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-04868-2
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An open-access database of nature-based carbon offset project boundaries

Elias Ayrey, Rachael K. Ross, Tristan R.H. Goodbody, John Kilbride et al.
3 citations
Scientific Data
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
3.32
article

An open-access database of nature-based carbon offset project boundaries

Elias Ayrey, Rachael K. Ross, Tristan R.H. Goodbody, John Kilbride, Akshata Karnik
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Nature-based climate solutions (NBS) have become an important component of strategies aiming to reduce atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> and mitigate climate change impacts. Carbon offsets have emerged as one of the most widely implemented NBS strategies, however, these projects have also been criticized for exaggerating offsets. Verifying the efficacy of NBS-derived carbon offset is complicated by a lack of readily available geospatial boundary data. Herein, we detail methods and present a database of nature-based offset project boundaries. This database provides the locations of 575 NBS projects distributed across 55 countries. Geospatial boundaries were aggregated using a combination of scraping data from carbon project registries (n = 433, 75.3%) as well as manual georeferencing and digitization (n = 127, 22.1%). Database entries include three varieties of carbon projects: avoided deforestation, afforestation, reforestation and re-vegetation, and improved forest management. An accuracy assessment of the georeferencing and digitizing process indicated a high degree of accuracy (intersection over union score of 0.98 ± 0.015).

Scientific DataVol. 12(1)
Targazyme (United States) (US), Carbon180 (US), Carbon Engineering (Canada) (CA)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.