Voting access reforms and policy feedback effects on political efficacy and trust

Abstract In 2020, states pursued divergent voting access reforms in an effort to facilitate a safe and secure election in the midst of a global pandemic. For some voters, options like mail‐in or no‐excuse absentee voting were familiar; for others, they were novel. While scholars have explored how election reforms affect turnout, we know less about how state‐level electoral policies influence people's political efficacy and trust, and how political context and voter partisanship condition those effects. Employing a policy feedback framework, our analysis combines original data on state changes to election procedures with ANES survey data from 1988 to 2020 to understand the context‐specific effects of voting access reforms on people's political efficacy and trust. Using time‐event difference‐in‐difference analysis, we find little evidence that electoral reforms affect political efficacy and trust overall; however, partisanship and state political context appear necessary to understand the true relationship between electoral reform and political behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy Studies Journal
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.70022
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Voting access reforms and policy feedback effects on political efficacy and trust

Andrew Trexler, Mallory E. SoRelle, Marayna Martinez
2 citations
Policy Studies Journal
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
17.04
article

Voting access reforms and policy feedback effects on political efficacy and trust

Andrew Trexler, Mallory E. SoRelle, Marayna Martinez
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract In 2020, states pursued divergent voting access reforms in an effort to facilitate a safe and secure election in the midst of a global pandemic. For some voters, options like mail‐in or no‐excuse absentee voting were familiar; for others, they were novel. While scholars have explored how election reforms affect turnout, we know less about how state‐level electoral policies influence people's political efficacy and trust, and how political context and voter partisanship condition those effects. Employing a policy feedback framework, our analysis combines original data on state changes to election procedures with ANES survey data from 1988 to 2020 to understand the context‐specific effects of voting access reforms on people's political efficacy and trust. Using time‐event difference‐in‐difference analysis, we find little evidence that electoral reforms affect political efficacy and trust overall; however, partisanship and state political context appear necessary to understand the true relationship between electoral reform and political behavior.

Policy Studies JournalVol. 53(2)
Duke University (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
17.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.