Sexual orientation and moral reasoning: an exploratory study

Recent evidence has found higher scores in three morally relevant traits such as psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism (dark triad traits) in non-heterosexual individuals. Yet, the current knowledge on how sexual orientation influences moral reasoning is limited. We investigated moral reasoning in a group of 31 non-heterosexual individuals (20 males, 3 asexual; mean age: 35.12, SD: 10.04) and 90 heterosexual individuals (16 males; mean age: 32.8, SD: 11.04) using the Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ-30). Additionally, we included other variables such as interoceptive awareness (via MAIA-2), disgust sensitivity (via DS-R), empathy (QCAE), which are known to predict moral appraisal, and emotional processing (via TAS-20). Bonferroni corrected t-test documents significant results for an overall reduced score in non-heterosexual individuals (M = 87.29 ± 13.96) compared to heterosexual individuals (M = 97.74 ± 17.61), which is confirmed only for Authority-Respect and Purity-Sanctity subscales. Moreover, in line with the existing literature, we observed significant positive correlations between MFQ-30 and subscale scores of DS-R, QCAE and MAIA-2 for heterosexual individuals. Despite limitations posed by the relatively small sample size of the non-heterosexual group and gender imbalance in the heterosexual group, these findings offer preliminary support for the hypothesis that non-heterosexual orientation is associated with reduced concerns regarding the values included in the moral foundation questionnaire. Emotional and cultural factors may be relevant to explain this result.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Psychology
Published
2025-04-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2025.2485746
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sexual orientation and moral reasoning: an exploratory study

Simona Massimino, Amelia Gangemi, Carmelo M. Vicario, Alice Lia Carmen Giunta
1 links
Cogent Psychology
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

Sexual orientation and moral reasoning: an exploratory study

Simona Massimino, Amelia Gangemi, Carmelo M. Vicario, Alice Lia Carmen Giunta
article en

Abstract

Recent evidence has found higher scores in three morally relevant traits such as psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism (dark triad traits) in non-heterosexual individuals. Yet, the current knowledge on how sexual orientation influences moral reasoning is limited. We investigated moral reasoning in a group of 31 non-heterosexual individuals (20 males, 3 asexual; mean age: 35.12, SD: 10.04) and 90 heterosexual individuals (16 males; mean age: 32.8, SD: 11.04) using the Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ-30). Additionally, we included other variables such as interoceptive awareness (via MAIA-2), disgust sensitivity (via DS-R), empathy (QCAE), which are known to predict moral appraisal, and emotional processing (via TAS-20). Bonferroni corrected t-test documents significant results for an overall reduced score in non-heterosexual individuals (M = 87.29 ± 13.96) compared to heterosexual individuals (M = 97.74 ± 17.61), which is confirmed only for Authority-Respect and Purity-Sanctity subscales. Moreover, in line with the existing literature, we observed significant positive correlations between MFQ-30 and subscale scores of DS-R, QCAE and MAIA-2 for heterosexual individuals. Despite limitations posed by the relatively small sample size of the non-heterosexual group and gender imbalance in the heterosexual group, these findings offer preliminary support for the hypothesis that non-heterosexual orientation is associated with reduced concerns regarding the values included in the moral foundation questionnaire. Emotional and cultural factors may be relevant to explain this result.

Cogent PsychologyVol. 12(1)
University of Messina (IT)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sexual orientation and moral reasoning: an exploratory study — Simona Massimino, Amelia Gangemi, et al. · Cogent Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS