Radiation protection and quality control in radiography services: a comparative study between national and international standards<i></i>

The creation of regulatory standards on radiation protection and quality control (QC) aims to establish a safety standard for services that use sources of ionizing radiation, seeking to guarantee the safety of those who may be exposed. In Brazil, the standard for radiation protection in x-ray imaging is the Resolução da Diretoria Colegiada No. 611 of the Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária and in its Normative Instruction (NI) No. 90 are determined 33 QC tests for conventional medical radiography to be carried out periodically as part of the service's Quality Assurance Program. Internationally, the International Commission on Radiological Protection promotes the advancement of the science of radiation protection. Regarding QC, the tests are mainly established by the International Atomic Energy Agency, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine, the American College of Radiology, and the European Commission. This study aimed to perform a comparative analysis between national and international standards for radiation protection and QC in radiography services. For this, a survey was carried out on radiation protection and QC standards of several countries through documentary research. Differences were observed regarding radiation protection standards between Brazil and other countries. The comparative study demonstrated significant differences in ionizing radiation dose limits and the positioning of the individual dosimeter. The analysis also revealed that NI No. 90 lacks descriptions of QC testing methodologies compared to international ones. In conclusion, the inclusion of additional QC tests, and greater detailing of existing regulations are needed for improvements to NI No. 90. However, it should be noted that Brazil is on par with developed countries regarding radiation protection regulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2025.2763
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radiation protection and quality control in radiography services: a comparative study between national and international standards

Isabelle Viviane Batista de Lacerda, Maria Victória Germano, Alex Oliveira
Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences
Radiation Dose and Imaging
article

Radiation protection and quality control in radiography services: a comparative study between national and international standards

Isabelle Viviane Batista de Lacerda, Maria Victória Germano, Alex Oliveira
article en

Abstract

The creation of regulatory standards on radiation protection and quality control (QC) aims to establish a safety standard for services that use sources of ionizing radiation, seeking to guarantee the safety of those who may be exposed. In Brazil, the standard for radiation protection in x-ray imaging is the Resolução da Diretoria Colegiada No. 611 of the Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária and in its Normative Instruction (NI) No. 90 are determined 33 QC tests for conventional medical radiography to be carried out periodically as part of the service's Quality Assurance Program. Internationally, the International Commission on Radiological Protection promotes the advancement of the science of radiation protection. Regarding QC, the tests are mainly established by the International Atomic Energy Agency, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine, the American College of Radiology, and the European Commission. This study aimed to perform a comparative analysis between national and international standards for radiation protection and QC in radiography services. For this, a survey was carried out on radiation protection and QC standards of several countries through documentary research. Differences were observed regarding radiation protection standards between Brazil and other countries. The comparative study demonstrated significant differences in ionizing radiation dose limits and the positioning of the individual dosimeter. The analysis also revealed that NI No. 90 lacks descriptions of QC testing methodologies compared to international ones. In conclusion, the inclusion of additional QC tests, and greater detailing of existing regulations are needed for improvements to NI No. 90. However, it should be noted that Brazil is on par with developed countries regarding radiation protection regulations.

Brazilian Journal of Radiation SciencesVol. 13(2)
Universidade Federal da Paraíba (BR), Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Pernambuco (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.