Validation of the Educational Corruption Model in Universities

Corruption in general, and educational corruption specifically, is a disruptive factor in the development of various societal sectors. The aim of the present study was to validate an educational corruption model in universities. This research was a quantitative-survey study and, in terms of its purpose, was applied. The statistical population included 384 employees of universities and higher education institutions, selected through random sampling. The research tool was a researcher-developed questionnaire based on qualitative findings and the literature review. Structural equation modeling with PLS Smart software was used for data analysis. The results indicated that in the quantitative evaluation of the model, all values were significant, greater than 1.96, and the standardized coefficients were greater than 0.4, confirming the model. Given that the goodness of fit index was 0.626, the final model was confirmed. Accordingly, the impact coefficient of strategies on outcomes (0.90 and t-value of 1.07), the impact of contextual conditions on strategies (24.6 and t-value of 4.7), the impact of intervening conditions on strategies (0.85 and t-value of 1.46), the impact of causal factors on the central phenomenon (93.4 and t-value of 14.6), and the impact of the central phenomenon on strategies (0.714 and t-value of 14.9) were observed. It can be concluded that corruption is a multi-dimensional issue, and higher education policymakers should focus on identifying its causes based on various research results, including the findings of this study, in order to establish and foster corruption-free higher education.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61838/jsied.4.5.1
Primary Topic
Ethics in Business and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the Educational Corruption Model in Universities

Hamid Shafizadeh, Nader Soleimani, Solayman Solaymani Tabar
Ethics in Business and Education
article

Validation of the Educational Corruption Model in Universities

Hamid Shafizadeh, Nader Soleimani, Solayman Solaymani Tabar
article en

Abstract

Corruption in general, and educational corruption specifically, is a disruptive factor in the development of various societal sectors. The aim of the present study was to validate an educational corruption model in universities. This research was a quantitative-survey study and, in terms of its purpose, was applied. The statistical population included 384 employees of universities and higher education institutions, selected through random sampling. The research tool was a researcher-developed questionnaire based on qualitative findings and the literature review. Structural equation modeling with PLS Smart software was used for data analysis. The results indicated that in the quantitative evaluation of the model, all values were significant, greater than 1.96, and the standardized coefficients were greater than 0.4, confirming the model. Given that the goodness of fit index was 0.626, the final model was confirmed. Accordingly, the impact coefficient of strategies on outcomes (0.90 and t-value of 1.07), the impact of contextual conditions on strategies (24.6 and t-value of 4.7), the impact of intervening conditions on strategies (0.85 and t-value of 1.46), the impact of causal factors on the central phenomenon (93.4 and t-value of 14.6), and the impact of the central phenomenon on strategies (0.714 and t-value of 14.9) were observed. It can be concluded that corruption is a multi-dimensional issue, and higher education policymakers should focus on identifying its causes based on various research results, including the findings of this study, in order to establish and foster corruption-free higher education.

Vol. 4(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Ethics in Business and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.