Impact of data density and endmember definitions on long-term trends in ground cover fractions across European grasslands

Long-term monitoring of grasslands is pivotal for ensuring continuity of many environmental services and for supporting food security and environmental modeling. Remote sensing provides an irreplaceable source of information for studying changes in grasslands. Specifically, Spectral Mixture Analysis (SMA) allows for quantification of physically meaningful ground cover fractions of grassland ecosystems (i.e., green vegetation, non-photosynthetic vegetation, and soil), which is crucial for our understanding of change processes and their drivers. However, although popular due to straightforward implementation and low computational cost, ‘classical’ SMA relies on a single endmember definition for each targeted ground cover component, thus offering limited suitability and generalization capability for heterogeneous landscapes. Furthermore, the impact of irregular data density on SMA-based long-term trends in grassland ground cover has also not yet been critically addressed. We conducted a systematic assessment of i) the impact of data density on long-term trends in ground cover fractions in grasslands; and ii) the effect of endmember definition used in ‘classical’ SMA on pixel- and map-level trends of grassland ground cover fractions. We performed our study for 13 sites across European grasslands and derived the trends based on the Cumulative Endmember Fractions calculated from monthly composites. We compared three different data density scenarios, i.e., 1984–2021 Landsat data record as is, 1984–2021 Landsat data record with the monthly probability of data after 2014 adjusted to the pre-2014 levels, and the combined 1984–2021 Landsat and 2015–2021 Sentinel-2 datasets. For each site we ran SMA using a selection of site-specific and generalized endmembers, and compared the pixel- and map-level trends. Our results indicated no significant impact of varying data density on the long-term trends from Cumulative Endmember Fractions in European grasslands. Conversely, the use of different endmember definitions led in some regions to significantly different pixel- and map-level long-term trends raising questions about the suitability of the ‘classical’ SMA for complex landscapes and large territories. Therefore, we caution against using the ‘classical’ SMA for remote-sensing-based applications across broader scales or in heterogenous landscapes, particularly for trend analyses, as the results may lead to erroneous conclusions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing of Environment
Published
2025-04-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.114736
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of data density and endmember definitions on long-term trends in ground cover fractions across European grasslands

Katja Kowalski, Katarzyna Ewa Lewińska, Patrick Hostert, Ulf Leser et al.
3 citations
Remote Sensing of Environment
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
5.15
article

Impact of data density and endmember definitions on long-term trends in ground cover fractions across European grasslands

Katja Kowalski, Katarzyna Ewa Lewińska, Patrick Hostert, Ulf Leser, Akpona Okujeni, Volker C. Radeloff, Fabian Lehmann
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Long-term monitoring of grasslands is pivotal for ensuring continuity of many environmental services and for supporting food security and environmental modeling. Remote sensing provides an irreplaceable source of information for studying changes in grasslands. Specifically, Spectral Mixture Analysis (SMA) allows for quantification of physically meaningful ground cover fractions of grassland ecosystems (i.e., green vegetation, non-photosynthetic vegetation, and soil), which is crucial for our understanding of change processes and their drivers. However, although popular due to straightforward implementation and low computational cost, ‘classical’ SMA relies on a single endmember definition for each targeted ground cover component, thus offering limited suitability and generalization capability for heterogeneous landscapes. Furthermore, the impact of irregular data density on SMA-based long-term trends in grassland ground cover has also not yet been critically addressed. We conducted a systematic assessment of i) the impact of data density on long-term trends in ground cover fractions in grasslands; and ii) the effect of endmember definition used in ‘classical’ SMA on pixel- and map-level trends of grassland ground cover fractions. We performed our study for 13 sites across European grasslands and derived the trends based on the Cumulative Endmember Fractions calculated from monthly composites. We compared three different data density scenarios, i.e., 1984–2021 Landsat data record as is, 1984–2021 Landsat data record with the monthly probability of data after 2014 adjusted to the pre-2014 levels, and the combined 1984–2021 Landsat and 2015–2021 Sentinel-2 datasets. For each site we ran SMA using a selection of site-specific and generalized endmembers, and compared the pixel- and map-level trends. Our results indicated no significant impact of varying data density on the long-term trends from Cumulative Endmember Fractions in European grasslands. Conversely, the use of different endmember definitions led in some regions to significantly different pixel- and map-level long-term trends raising questions about the suitability of the ‘classical’ SMA for complex landscapes and large territories. Therefore, we caution against using the ‘classical’ SMA for remote-sensing-based applications across broader scales or in heterogenous landscapes, particularly for trend analyses, as the results may lead to erroneous conclusions.

Remote Sensing of EnvironmentVol. 323
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
5.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.