Experimental Evaluation of Direct‐Burial Subterranean Battery Energy Storage System

ABSTRACT Battery energy storage systems have become an integral part of the electricity system as an increased quantity of variable renewable energy generation such as solar photovoltaics (PVs) and wind turbines is deployed. Siting and placement of the battery system is important for thermal management, safety, and use of space. Literature on this topic has only considered above‐ground installations. Direct‐burial subterranean installations can address the siting topics by providing access to relatively consistent ground temperatures, encasement of the battery in nonflammable soil, and permitting other uses of the ground surface above (e.g., athletic field). However, batteries generate heat during operation, and although in direct contact with the soil, the soil has poor thermal conductivity, potentially restricting operations to low‐power applications. This research designs, builds, instruments, and demonstrates the operation of a direct‐burial subterranean battery while exploring the thermal dynamics of the battery (NCA lithium ion) versus the surrounding backfill soil (thermal sand, k = 2.8 W/mK), with attention to peak temperatures and heat dissipation timelines. The results identify limitations of a residential behind‐the‐meter battery operation for either PV self‐consumption or load following (LF) application signals. The PV self‐consumption signal, which completes less than 1 cycle per day, results in a 4°C increase in the battery temperature, given the condition of the soil used during battery operation, and returning to original temperatures during the lengthy overnight rest period. The more aggressive LF signal, completing more than 2 cycles per day, elevated the temperature by 16°C within a single day, given the conditions of the soil employed in this experiment. Continued operations of the LF signal would cause overheating and so need to be completed only once every several days. The experimental findings will be used to design and calibrate a new subterranean battery energy storage system numerical models to predict performance for unique battery shapes, installation depths, climates, and arrays of batteries. In this fashion, this new battery technology may be deployed to meet specific applications throughout varied environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Storage
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/est2.70169
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental Evaluation of Direct‐Burial Subterranean Battery Energy Storage System

J. R. Dahn, Bryan Ellis, Jason A. Zrum, Lukas G. Swan et al.
1 citations
Energy Storage
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
0.68
article

Experimental Evaluation of Direct‐Burial Subterranean Battery Energy Storage System

J. R. Dahn, Bryan Ellis, Jason A. Zrum, Lukas G. Swan, Mayank Singh, Elizabeth Oyekola, Avery Opalka, Sean Balfour
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Battery energy storage systems have become an integral part of the electricity system as an increased quantity of variable renewable energy generation such as solar photovoltaics (PVs) and wind turbines is deployed. Siting and placement of the battery system is important for thermal management, safety, and use of space. Literature on this topic has only considered above‐ground installations. Direct‐burial subterranean installations can address the siting topics by providing access to relatively consistent ground temperatures, encasement of the battery in nonflammable soil, and permitting other uses of the ground surface above (e.g., athletic field). However, batteries generate heat during operation, and although in direct contact with the soil, the soil has poor thermal conductivity, potentially restricting operations to low‐power applications. This research designs, builds, instruments, and demonstrates the operation of a direct‐burial subterranean battery while exploring the thermal dynamics of the battery (NCA lithium ion) versus the surrounding backfill soil (thermal sand, k = 2.8 W/mK), with attention to peak temperatures and heat dissipation timelines. The results identify limitations of a residential behind‐the‐meter battery operation for either PV self‐consumption or load following (LF) application signals. The PV self‐consumption signal, which completes less than 1 cycle per day, results in a 4°C increase in the battery temperature, given the condition of the soil used during battery operation, and returning to original temperatures during the lengthy overnight rest period. The more aggressive LF signal, completing more than 2 cycles per day, elevated the temperature by 16°C within a single day, given the conditions of the soil employed in this experiment. Continued operations of the LF signal would cause overheating and so need to be completed only once every several days. The experimental findings will be used to design and calibrate a new subterranean battery energy storage system numerical models to predict performance for unique battery shapes, installation depths, climates, and arrays of batteries. In this fashion, this new battery technology may be deployed to meet specific applications throughout varied environments.

Energy StorageVol. 7(3)
Dalhousie University (CA), Yukon University (CA)
Nova Scotia Research Innovation Trust, Canada Foundation for Innovation, Dalhousie University, Emera, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.