Investigating majority‐minority asymmetries between intergroup contact and collective action for Roma rights

The Roma-an ethnic minority group in Europe-continues to face high levels of discrimination. This research explores how the quality of contact between Roma and non-Roma is associated with collective action participation for Roma rights in Spain. It examines non-Roma as potential allies (Study 1; N = 239) and Roma (Study 2; N = 259), while considering the roles of social class, social identification (Roma and multiculturalist identities) and perceived discrimination in this process. Study 1 found that for non-Roma, high-quality contact with Roma, particularly with those attributed to a low social class, was related to non-Roma collective action both directly and indirectly through the high perception of discrimination and multiculturalist identity. However, the results of Study 2 with the Roma sample indicated that the quality of contact with non-Roma was associated with a lower perception of discrimination towards Roma, which in turn was related to lower intention to participate in collective action. Nevertheless, the quality of contact was associated with higher Roma intention to participate in collective action through increased multiculturalist identity, counteracting the sedative effects of contact. These findings emphasize the importance of social class, identity and perceived discrimination when examining the relationship between contact and collective action.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Social Psychology
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12880
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating majority‐minority asymmetries between intergroup contact and collective action for Roma rights

Ana Urbiola, Lucía López‐Rodríguez, Alexandra Vázquez, Laura C. Torres‐Vega et al.
2 citations
British Journal of Social Psychology
Social and Intergroup Psychology
8.40
article

Investigating majority‐minority asymmetries between intergroup contact and collective action for Roma rights

Ana Urbiola, Lucía López‐Rodríguez, Alexandra Vázquez, Laura C. Torres‐Vega, Cristina Carmona‐López, Marisol Navas
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The Roma-an ethnic minority group in Europe-continues to face high levels of discrimination. This research explores how the quality of contact between Roma and non-Roma is associated with collective action participation for Roma rights in Spain. It examines non-Roma as potential allies (Study 1; N = 239) and Roma (Study 2; N = 259), while considering the roles of social class, social identification (Roma and multiculturalist identities) and perceived discrimination in this process. Study 1 found that for non-Roma, high-quality contact with Roma, particularly with those attributed to a low social class, was related to non-Roma collective action both directly and indirectly through the high perception of discrimination and multiculturalist identity. However, the results of Study 2 with the Roma sample indicated that the quality of contact with non-Roma was associated with a lower perception of discrimination towards Roma, which in turn was related to lower intention to participate in collective action. Nevertheless, the quality of contact was associated with higher Roma intention to participate in collective action through increased multiculturalist identity, counteracting the sedative effects of contact. These findings emphasize the importance of social class, identity and perceived discrimination when examining the relationship between contact and collective action.

British Journal of Social PsychologyVol. 64(2)
Universidad de Granada (ES), Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (ES), University of Almería (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, European Commission, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Reduced inequalities, Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.