Highlighting Counterstereotypical Scientists in Undergraduate Life Science Courses

Increasingly, curricular materials for undergraduate life science courses are designed to highlight scientists with identities and backgrounds that counter historical and stereotypical representation in science. In this essay, we characterize the wide variation in the development and implementation of these curricular materials featuring counterstereotypical scientists. Applying the Social Ecological Model of Behavior Change as a framework, we examine both personal and social elements of the benefits and costs related to designing and implementing curricula featuring counterstereotypical scientists from the perspective of three groups: students, instructors, and the featured scientists. The benefits of these materials for students are well documented, and we consider how these materials may likewise benefit instructors and the featured scientists themselves. However, we emphasize that, if not developed and implemented with attention to the diversity of personal, social, and contextual factors, such well-intentioned efforts may be ineffective or impact groups in inadvertent ways. Finally, we offer recommendations for highlighting counterstereotypical scientists in curricula. We call for additional research to effectively develop and implement materials featuring counterstereotypical scientists in ways that maximize benefits and limit possible costs to students, instructors, and the featured scientists.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CBE—Life Sciences Education
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.24-02-0082
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Highlighting Counterstereotypical Scientists in Undergraduate Life Science Courses

Melissa K. Kjelvik, Marcos E. García‐Ojeda, Paula E. Adams, Sharday N. Ewell et al.
1 citations
CBE—Life Sciences Education
Career Development and Diversity
2.37
article

Highlighting Counterstereotypical Scientists in Undergraduate Life Science Courses

Melissa K. Kjelvik, Marcos E. García‐Ojeda, Paula E. Adams, Sharday N. Ewell, Ash T. Zemenick, Melinda T. Owens, Kimberly X. Mulligan, Kim Quillin, Suann Yang, Elli J. Theobald, Cissy J. Ballen, Alastair M. Curry, Mallory M. Rice, Kelsey J. Metzger, Elizabeth H. Schultheis, Brie Tripp, Robin A. Costello, Dax Ovid, Maurina L. Aranda, María Jesús, Stephanie J. Gutzler, Ryan D. P. Dunk, R. Morgan Pigg, J. R. Schultz, Linda R. A. Habersham, Myesha Mateen, Selorm Sovi, Erica Tracey
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Increasingly, curricular materials for undergraduate life science courses are designed to highlight scientists with identities and backgrounds that counter historical and stereotypical representation in science. In this essay, we characterize the wide variation in the development and implementation of these curricular materials featuring counterstereotypical scientists. Applying the Social Ecological Model of Behavior Change as a framework, we examine both personal and social elements of the benefits and costs related to designing and implementing curricula featuring counterstereotypical scientists from the perspective of three groups: students, instructors, and the featured scientists. The benefits of these materials for students are well documented, and we consider how these materials may likewise benefit instructors and the featured scientists themselves. However, we emphasize that, if not developed and implemented with attention to the diversity of personal, social, and contextual factors, such well-intentioned efforts may be ineffective or impact groups in inadvertent ways. Finally, we offer recommendations for highlighting counterstereotypical scientists in curricula. We call for additional research to effectively develop and implement materials featuring counterstereotypical scientists in ways that maximize benefits and limit possible costs to students, instructors, and the featured scientists.

CBE—Life Sciences EducationVol. 24(2)
Howard University (US), University of Louisville (US), University of California, Merced (US), University of Georgia (US), Georgia State University (US), University of Washington (US), California State University, San Marcos (US), SUNY Geneseo (US), University of Michigan (US), University of California San Diego (US), University of Mississippi (US), University of Minnesota Rochester (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US), Auburn University (US), University of California, Davis (US), Michigan State University (US), Southern Illinois University Edwardsville (US), Salisbury University (US)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Career Development and Diversity
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.