Access to General Practice Data for Research in Australia: The Need for Greater Clarity in Relation to Privacy and Confidentiality.

While the demand for access to general practice data for research in Australia is strong, the current legal and policy framework regulating this activity does not provide clear guidance for stakeholders. The use of general practice data is regulated by two bodies of law: the equitable duty of confidence and data protection legislation. General practitioners must comply with both bodies of law in using or disclosing general practice data for research. The Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) (Privacy Act) recognises and supports the use of personal health information for research, including without consent in specific circumstances where it is impracticable to obtain consent. The equitable duty of confidence only allows the use of health information for research with express, voluntary, and informed consent. This distinction has the potential to place general practitioners who release information for research under the Privacy Act in breach of their duty of confidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Access to General Practice Data for Research in Australia: The Need for Greater Clarity in Relation to Privacy and Confidentiality.

Felicity Flack, Annette Braunack‐Mayer, Carolyn Adams
PubMed
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Access to General Practice Data for Research in Australia: The Need for Greater Clarity in Relation to Privacy and Confidentiality.

Felicity Flack, Annette Braunack‐Mayer, Carolyn Adams
article en

Abstract

While the demand for access to general practice data for research in Australia is strong, the current legal and policy framework regulating this activity does not provide clear guidance for stakeholders. The use of general practice data is regulated by two bodies of law: the equitable duty of confidence and data protection legislation. General practitioners must comply with both bodies of law in using or disclosing general practice data for research. The Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) (Privacy Act) recognises and supports the use of personal health information for research, including without consent in specific circumstances where it is impracticable to obtain consent. The equitable duty of confidence only allows the use of health information for research with express, voluntary, and informed consent. This distinction has the potential to place general practitioners who release information for research under the Privacy Act in breach of their duty of confidence.

PubMedVol. 31(4)
The University of Western Australia (AU), University of Wollongong (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.